Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Halothane and propofol differentially affect electroencephalographic responses to noxious stimulation.

M Orth1, L Barter, C Dominguez

  • 1Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of California, Davis, 95616, USA.

British Journal of Anaesthesia
|July 30, 2005
PubMed
Summary

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Corrigendum to "Thermal hyperalgesia and mechanical allodynia elicited by histamine and non-histaminergic itch mediators: respective involvement of TRPV1 and TRPA1". [Neuroscience 449 (2020) 35-45].

Neuroscience·2025
Same author

Role of thermosensitive transient receptor potential (TRP) channels in thermal preference of male and female mice.

Journal of thermal biology·2024
Same author

Natural language processing tools for non-clinical healthcare management.

Journal of healthcare quality research·2023
Same author

Angiogenic imbalance in maternal and cord blood is associated with neonatal birth weight and head circumference in pregnancies with major fetal congenital heart defect.

Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology·2023
Same author

Enhancement of allyl isothiocyanate-evoked responses of mouse trigeminal ganglion cells by the kokumi substance γ-glutamyl-valyl-glycine (γ-EVG) through activation of the calcium-sensing receptor (CaSR).

Physiology & behavior·2022
Same author

Smoking and drinking habits of women in subsequent pregnancies after specific advice about the dangers of these exposures during pregnancy.

South African medical journal = Suid-Afrikaanse tydskrif vir geneeskunde·2021

Propofol more effectively blunts electroencephalographic (EEG) responses to noxious stimuli than halothane. This study compared the effects of these anesthetics on EEG activation during noxious stimulation in rats.

Area of Science:

  • Anesthesiology
  • Neuroscience
  • Pharmacology

Background:

  • Anesthetics modulate neuronal responses to noxious stimuli, impacting electroencephalographic (EEG) activity.
  • The differential effects of anesthetics like propofol and halothane on EEG activation by noxious stimuli remain unclear.
  • Investigating these differences is crucial for understanding anesthetic mechanisms and optimizing patient care.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the effects of propofol and halothane on EEG activation induced by noxious stimuli.
  • To evaluate how different anesthetic concentrations influence EEG responses to electrical C-fibre stimulation and noxious tail clamping.
  • To determine which anesthetic agent exhibits a greater blunting effect on EEG activation.

Main Methods:

  • Rats were anesthetized with halothane or propofol at varying concentrations (0.8x and 1.2x immobility doses).

Related Experiment Videos

  • EEG responses were recorded during repetitive electrical stimulation (0.1, 1, 3 Hz) and noxious tail clamping.
  • Key EEG parameters analyzed included spectral edge frequency (SEF) and median edge frequency (MEF).

    • Main Results:

    • Halothane at both concentrations induced EEG activation (increased SEF and MEF) in response to noxious stimuli, particularly those evoking neuronal wind-up.
    • Propofol at 0.8 ED(50) showed minimal EEG activation, with only tail clamping and 1 Hz stimulation causing minor increases in MEF.
    • At 1.2 ED(50), propofol suppressed EEG responses, paradoxically decreasing SEF during noxious stimulation.

    Conclusions:

    • Propofol demonstrates a more potent blunting effect on noxious stimulation-evoked EEG activation compared to halothane.
    • These findings suggest differential mechanisms of action between propofol and halothane in modulating nociceptive processing.
    • Understanding these differences can inform anesthetic choices for procedures involving noxious stimuli.