Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 16, 2026

Evaluation of a Novel Laser-assisted Coronary Anastomotic Connector - the Trinity Clip - in a Porcine Off-pump Bypass Model
Published on: November 24, 2014
Intra-operative Doppler flow measurement do not predict 'at-risk' status of infrainguinal bypass grafts
V P Jagadesham1, S Snowdon, M J Weston
1Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, St James' University Hospital, Lincoln Wing, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK.
Aims:
Patients undergoing infrainguinal arterial reconstruction using vein conduits, frequently undergo intra-operative Doppler flow measurements to determine technical adequacy. The aim of this study was to determine the proportion of vein grafts with normal intra-operative haemodynamic parameters that were subsequently discovered to be 'at risk' on post-operative duplex surveillance scanning.
Methods:
We prospectively collected data on 82, primary infrainguinal vein bypass grafts. Post papaverine graft flow and peripheral resistance were measured using the Scimed Opdop intra-operative Doppler machine. All grafts were determined to be technically adequate on the basis of measured peripheral resistance units (mPRU) being < or =1. At 1 week, a post-operative duplex surveillance scan was performed. At risk status was determined and compared to the intra-operative Doppler flow measurement. Statistical analysis was performed using the Mann-Whitney U-test.
Results:
The post-operative duplex scan demonstrated that 53 (65%) of the 82 vein bypass grafts were diagnosed as being 'not at risk'; and 29 (35%) were regarded as at risk. When the groups were compared, there was no significant difference in intra-operative haemodynamic parameters between those not at risk and those at risk (P=0.19, Mann-Whitney U-test). The 1 month primary patency rate was 79% with a secondary patency rate of 100%.
Conclusion:
Despite normal intra-operative Doppler flow measurements, 35% of vein grafts were regarded as being at risk at the 1 week post-operative duplex surveillance scan. No single value may be universally applicable for identifying at risk grafts intraoperatively. Indeed, graft failure appears to be a multifactorial process.