Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Testing equality of two functions using BARS.

Sam Behseta1, Robert E Kass

  • 1Department of Mathematics, California State University Bakersfield, Bakersfield, CA 93311, USA. sbehseta@csub.edu

Statistics in Medicine
|August 2, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Relative timing and coupling of neural population bursts in large-scale recordings from multiple neuron populations.

Frontiers in computational neuroscience·2026
Same author

Cross-population amplitude coupling in high-dimensional oscillatory neural time series.

Frontiers in computational neuroscience·2026
Same author

A Population Coupling Model Identifies Reduced Propagation from V1 to Higher Visual Areas During Locomotion.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Relative timing and coupling of neural population bursts in large-scale recordings from multiple neuron populations.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025
Same author

Oscillating neural circuits: Phase, amplitude, and the complex normal distribution.

The Canadian journal of statistics = Revue canadienne de statistique·2024
Same author

Identification of interacting neural populations: methods and statistical considerations.

Journal of neurophysiology·2023
Same journal

Optimal Weighted Tests for Replication Studies and the 'Two-Trials Rule' With Multiple Hypotheses.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Identifiable Copula-Double-Cox Models: A Fully Parametric Framework for Dependent Right-Censored Survival Data.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Moving From Individualized Risk-Based Prevention to Benefit-Based Prevention: Estimating Individualized Life-Years Gained From Prevention Services as a Basis for Eligibility.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

A Mixture of Distributed Lag Non-Linear Models to Account for Spatially Heterogeneous Exposure-Lag-Response Associations.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Practical Considerations for Gaussian Process Modeling for Causal Inference in Quasi-Experimental Studies With Panel Data.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Covariate Adjustment for Wilcoxon Two Sample Statistic and Test.

Statistics in medicine·2026
See all related articles

This study introduces two methods, Bayes factors and a modified Hotelling T(2) test, for comparing functions within a generalized non-parametric regression framework. These methods effectively analyze neurophysiological data, such as Poisson process intensity functions, with comparable results.

Area of Science:

  • Statistics
  • Neuroscience
  • Computational Biology

Background:

  • Generalized non-parametric regression is crucial for analyzing complex biological data.
  • Testing the equality of functions, particularly Poisson process intensity functions in neurophysiology, is a common challenge.
  • Bayesian adaptive regression splines (BARS) offer a novel approach to non-parametric regression.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present and compare two novel statistical methods for testing the equality of two functions within a generalized non-parametric regression framework.
  • To apply these methods to the specific case of comparing Poisson process intensity functions, relevant to neurophysiological research.
  • To evaluate the performance and utility of Bayes factors and a modified Hotelling T(2) test in this context.

Main Methods:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Utilizing Bayesian adaptive regression splines (BARS) for generalized non-parametric regression.
  • Implementing a Bayes factor approach for hypothesis testing.
  • Applying a modified Hotelling T(2) test for hypothesis testing.

Main Results:

  • Both Bayes factors and the modified Hotelling T(2) test were applied to analyze 347 motor cortical neurons.
  • The two methods yielded consistent conclusions for the majority of neurons analyzed.
  • Simulation studies indicated that Bayes factors may offer higher power in smaller sample sizes.

Conclusions:

  • The modified Hotelling T(2) test is valuable for screening numerous neurons for condition-related activity.
  • Bayes factors are particularly effective for assessing evidence supporting the null hypothesis of function equality.
  • The developed methods provide robust tools for functional comparisons in neurophysiological and other non-parametric regression applications.