Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 16, 2026

Highlighting and Reducing the Impact of Negative Aging Stereotypes During Older Adults' Cognitive Testing
Published on: January 24, 2020
Judgments of risk frequencies: tests of possible cognitive mechanisms
Ralph Hertwig1, Thorsten Pachur, Stephanie Kurzenhäuser
1Department of Psychology, University of Basel, Missionsstrasse 60/62, 4055 Basel, Switzerland. ralph.hertwig@unibas.ch
Abstract:
How do people judge which of 2 risks claims more lives per year? The authors specified 4 candidate mechanisms and tested them against people's judgments in 3 risk environments. Two mechanisms, availability by recall and regressed frequency, conformed best to people's choices. The same mechanisms also accounted well for the mapping accuracy of estimates of absolute risk frequencies. Their nearly indistinguishable level of performance is remarkable given their different assumptions about the underlying cognitive processes and the fact that they give rise to different expectations regarding the accuracy of people's inferences. The authors discuss this seeming paradox, the lack of impact of financial incentives on judgmental accuracy, and the dominant interpretation of inaccurate inferences in terms of biased information processing.
Related Concept Videos
Determination of Expected Frequency
Cognitivism
Previously dominated by behaviorism, which prioritized observable behaviors and largely ignored mental processes, psychology transformed in the 1950s. Cognitive psychologists argue that understanding how we think and process information is...
The Availability Heuristic
Reason and Intuition
Lazarus's Cognitive Appraisal Theory
Primary Appraisal:...
Causes of Social Behavior II: Cognitive Processes

