Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Voluntary task switching: chasing the elusive homunculus.

Catherine M Arrington1, Gordon D Logan

  • 1Department of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, 111 21st Avenue South, Nashville, TN 37203, USA. kate.arrington@lehigh.edu

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition
|August 3, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Imagine No Resources: Attention Is Selection and Normalization for Choice.

Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science·2026
Same author

Separating decision and motor contributions to behavioral biases induced by manipulating stimulus probability.

Cognitive psychology·2026
Same author

Spotlight on the past: Focusing attention on long-term memory.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same author

Order is ordinal in serial memory.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2025
Same author

It was 40 years ago today: Reflections "On the ability to inhibit simple and choice reaction time responses: A model and a method" by Logan et al. (1984).

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2025
Same author

The power of many: The role of global matching in the episodic flanker compatibility effect.

Memory & cognition·2025
Same journal

Memory loves company: Related object pairs benefit working memory.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

Ranschburg unrepeated.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

It was the best of times, it was the worst of times: Evidence for switch cost beyond stimulus-response tasks.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

Testing the predictions of a distinctiveness model of memory: The production effect in backward recall.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

On the impact of adjacency on transposed-word effects under serial presentation.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

It's time to opt out: Metacognitive analysis of time regulation under uncertainty.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
See all related articles

In voluntary task switching, individuals control task selection, demonstrating top-down processing. Choosing to switch tasks incurs smaller costs than externally cued switches, supporting cognitive control models.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Human Factors

Background:

  • Task switching is crucial for cognitive flexibility.
  • Understanding the control mechanisms (top-down vs. bottom-up) in task switching is essential.
  • Voluntary task switching allows for self-paced control, contrasting with externally cued tasks.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the role of top-down control in voluntary task switching.
  • To compare switch costs in voluntary versus externally cued task switching.
  • To differentiate choice costs from switch costs in cognitive control.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a voluntary task switching paradigm where participants chose tasks.
  • Contrasted voluntary task switching with explicit task cuing across multiple experiments.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Separated choice costs from switch costs to analyze cognitive processes.

    • Main Results:

    • Choice behavior was minimally influenced by external stimulus characteristics, supporting top-down control.
    • Switch costs were significantly smaller in voluntary task switching compared to externally cued switching.
    • Distinguished and quantified choice costs from switch costs.

    Conclusions:

    • Findings support cognitive models that emphasize top-down processes in task switching.
    • Voluntary task switching procedures may better isolate top-down control compared to externally cued methods.
    • Environmental support within task switching procedures influences the balance of top-down and bottom-up processing.