Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 16, 2026

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
Published on: September 27, 2019
The problem of measurement model misspecification in behavioral and organizational research and some recommended
Scott B MacKenzie1, Philip M Podsakoff, Cheryl Burke Jarvis
1Department of Marketing, Kelley School of Business, Indiana University Bloomington, Bloomington, IN 47405-1701, USA. mackenz@indiana.edu
Abstract:
The purpose of this study was to review the distinction between formative- and reflective-indicator measurement models, articulate a set of criteria for deciding whether measures are formative or reflective, illustrate some commonly researched constructs that have formative indicators, empirically test the effects of measurement model misspecification using a Monte Carlo simulation, and recommend new scale development procedures for latent constructs with formative indicators. Results of the Monte Carlo simulation indicated that measurement model misspecification can inflate unstandardized structural parameter estimates by as much as 400% or deflate them by as much as 80% and lead to Type I or Type II errors of inference, depending on whether the exogenous or the endogenous latent construct is misspecified. Implications of this research are discussed.
Related Concept Videos
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis
Random and Systematic Errors
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Regression Toward the Mean
Modeling in Therapy
Participant Modeling
Participant modeling involves therapists demonstrating calm and effective behaviors in situations...