A comparative approach to cue competition with one and two strong predictors
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 16, 2026

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons
Published on: November 9, 2018
Irina Baetu1, A G Baker, Christine Darredeau
1Department of Psychology, McGill University, 1205 Dr Penfield Ave, Montréal, QC, H3A 1B1 Canada.
Abstract:
The relative validity effect (Wagner, Logan, Haberlandt, & Price, 1968) demonstrated that a strong cue or cause reduces responding to, or judgments of, a weaker cue or cause. We report two experiments with human subjects using relative validity preparations in which we investigate one- and two-cue competition effects. Previously, we investigated the effect using instrumental and Pavlovian conditioning preparations with rats. In the first experiment, we used a procedure analogous to the animal preparations. In the second experiment, we used a different probabilistic procedure. The results with humans and rats are very similar. In each species we find similar interference with processing the moderate predictor with one or with two strong competitors. These results are not well predicted by most associative models.
Related Concept Videos
Theory of Attribution II: Kelley's Covariation Theory
Theory of Attribution I: Correspondent Inference Theory
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Multiple Comparison Tests
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
Non-Verbal Cues
Causes of Similarity-Dissimilarity Effect

