Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Gene Evolution - Fast or Slow?02:05

Gene Evolution - Fast or Slow?

The genomes of eukaryotes are punctuated by long stretches of sequence which do not code for proteins or RNAs. Although some of these regions do contain crucial regulatory sequences, the vast majority of this DNA serves no known function. Typically, these regions of the genome are the ones in which the fastest change, in evolutionary terms, is observed, because there is typically little to no selection pressure acting on these regions to preserve their sequences.
In contrast, regions which code...
Protein Families02:47

Protein Families

Protein families are groups of homologous proteins; that is, they have similarities in amino acid sequences and three-dimensional structures. Protein families usually occur because of gene duplication, where an additional copy of a gene is inserted into the genome of an organism.   Mutations that change the amino acids but still allow the protein to be properly synthesized, will lead to new protein family members.   If these new proteins contain similar amino acids in key locations, protein...
Conservation of Protein Domains Over Different Proteins02:26

Conservation of Protein Domains Over Different Proteins

Protein domains are small structurally independent units that are part of a single amino acid chain.  Although these domains are often structurally independent, they may rely on synergistic effects to perform their functions as part of a larger protein. Protein domains may be conserved within the same organism, as well as across different organisms.
A limited set of protein domains often duplicate and recombine during evolution. These domains can be organized in different combinations to form...
Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons02:54

Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons

Genome comparison is one of the excellent ways to interpret the evolutionary relationships between organisms. The basic principle of genome comparison is that if two species share a common feature, it is likely encoded by the DNA sequence conserved between both species. The advent of genome sequencing technologies in the late 20th century enabled scientists to understand the concept of conservation of domains between species and helped them to deduce evolutionary relationships across diverse...
Multi-species Conserved Sequences02:51

Multi-species Conserved Sequences

Next-generation sequencing technologies have created large genomic databases of a variety of animals and plants. Ever since the human genome project was completed, scientists studied the genome of primates, mammals, and other phylogenetically distant living beings. Such large-scale  studies have provided new insights into the evolutionary relationship between organisms.
Although the genome of each species varies greatly from each other, a few sequences are highly conserved. Such conserved DNA...
Conservation of Protein Domains02:26

Conservation of Protein Domains

Protein domains are small structurally independent units that are part of a single amino acid chain.  Although these domains are often structurally independent, they may rely on synergistic effects to perform their functions as part of a larger protein. Protein domains may be conserved within the same organism, as well as across different organisms.
A limited set of protein domains often duplicate and recombine during evolution. These domains can be organized in different combinations to form...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The educational implications of biotechnology: A report on the seminar held at the National University of Singapore on June 5, 1981 by the IUBS Commission for Biological Education.

Biochemical education·2020
Same author

Evolutionary inaccuracy of pairwise structural alignments.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2012
Same author

Depletion of RUNX1/ETO in t(8;21) AML cells leads to genome-wide changes in chromatin structure and transcription factor binding.

Leukemia·2012
Same author

KvSNP: accurately predicting the effect of genetic variants in voltage-gated potassium channels.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2011
Same author

On the evolutionary origins of "Fold Space Continuity": a study of topological convergence and divergence in mixed alpha-beta domains.

Journal of structural biology·2010
Same author

The sequence-structure relationship and protein function prediction.

Current opinion in structural biology·2009

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 11, 2026

Protein WISDOM: A Workbench for In silico De novo Design of BioMolecules
10:58

Protein WISDOM: A Workbench for In silico De novo Design of BioMolecules

Published on: July 25, 2013

Automated derivation and refinement of sequence length patterns for protein sequences using evolutionary computation.

M I Sadowski1, J H Parish, D R Westhead

  • 1Bioinformatics Unit, Department of Computer Science, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK.

Bio Systems
|August 4, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces an evolutionary algorithm for creating minimal protein signatures for G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs). These sparse profiles accurately classify GPCRs without multiple alignments, improving sequence-based protein classification.

More Related Videos

An Integrated Approach for Microprotein Identification and Sequence Analysis
09:37

An Integrated Approach for Microprotein Identification and Sequence Analysis

Published on: July 12, 2022

Application of I TASSER, trRosetta, UCSF Chimera, HADDOCK server, and HEX loria for De Novo and In Silico Design of Proteins
05:08

Application of I TASSER, trRosetta, UCSF Chimera, HADDOCK server, and HEX loria for De Novo and In Silico Design of Proteins

Published on: July 8, 2025

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 11, 2026

Protein WISDOM: A Workbench for In silico De novo Design of BioMolecules
10:58

Protein WISDOM: A Workbench for In silico De novo Design of BioMolecules

Published on: July 25, 2013

An Integrated Approach for Microprotein Identification and Sequence Analysis
09:37

An Integrated Approach for Microprotein Identification and Sequence Analysis

Published on: July 12, 2022

Application of I TASSER, trRosetta, UCSF Chimera, HADDOCK server, and HEX loria for De Novo and In Silico Design of Proteins
05:08

Application of I TASSER, trRosetta, UCSF Chimera, HADDOCK server, and HEX loria for De Novo and In Silico Design of Proteins

Published on: July 8, 2025

Area of Science:

  • Bioinformatics
  • Computational Biology
  • Protein Science

Background:

  • Protein classification relies on sequence, structure, and function.
  • G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) are a crucial class of integral membrane proteins.
  • Deriving accurate and efficient classification signatures is an ongoing challenge.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a novel evolutionary algorithm (EA) for deriving sparse profiles (signatures) for GPCR classification.
  • To apply an evolution strategy (ES) for refining protein patterns and profiles.
  • To assess the performance of derived signatures in classifying GPCR sequences.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized an evolutionary algorithm (EA) to generate sparse profiles without requiring multiple sequence alignments.
  • Employed an evolution strategy (ES) for the refinement of protein patterns and profiles.
  • Derived GPCR signatures using a database of integral membrane proteins and a modified receiver operator characteristic (ROC) statistic.

Main Results:

  • A signature for family 1 GPCR sequences achieved 76% detection at a 5% error rate in cross-validation.
  • The ES refinement method improved the coverage of a previously developed signature by 6% at 5% error.
  • The developed EA method successfully generated effective sparse profiles for GPCR classification.

Conclusions:

  • The evolutionary algorithm provides an effective method for deriving sparse profiles for GPCR classification.
  • Signature-based classification shows promise but may have inherent limitations.
  • This approach enhances the ability to classify integral membrane proteins based on sequence data.