Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Is the body a republic?

Simona Giordano1

  • 1Institute of Medicine, Law and Bioethics, School of Law, University of Manchester, Williamson Building, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, UK. simona.giordano@man.ac.uk

Journal of Medical Ethics
|August 4, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Why Do the Bells Toll? : How to Understand and Address the Disputes Around Evidence in Support of the Use of Puberty Blockers for Young People with Gender Incongruence/Dysphoria.

Journal of bioethical inquiry·2026
Same author

Letter of Concern About Ruuska et al. From 4 April 2026.

Acta paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992)·2026
Same author

Keep calm but do not carry on: ethical issues with the recommendations made by the Cass Review-Giordano response to the commentaries.

Journal of medical ethics·2025
Same author

The importance of early and accurate service information for young people accessing gender care.

Scientific reports·2025
Same author

Principlism and contemporary ethical considerations for providers of transgender health care.

International journal of transgender health·2025
Same author

Keep calm but do not carry on: ethical issues with the recommendations made by the Cass Review (2024).

Journal of medical ethics·2025

Post-mortem organ retention and use ethics are debated. This paper argues against treating dead bodies as public property, advocating for informed citizen choices to maximize organ availability.

Area of Science:

  • Bioethics
  • Medical Law
  • Public Health Policy

Background:

  • The ethical considerations surrounding post-mortem organ retention and use are complex and frequently debated.
  • Existing ethical frameworks often inadequately address the fundamental issues concerning the status of deceased individuals and their bodies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To articulate the ethical issues involved in the retention and use of organs and tissues after death.
  • To examine these ethical issues in scenarios where the deceased's wishes are known and unknown.
  • To propose a framework for maximizing organ and tissue availability.

Main Methods:

  • Ethical analysis of arguments regarding the status of deceased bodies.
  • Review of legal and bioethical literature on organ donation and retention.
Keywords:
Health Care and Public Health

Related Experiment Videos

  • Development of a normative ethical argument concerning bodily property rights post-mortem.

    • Main Results:

    • Critiques the "res publica" argument that dead bodies automatically become public property.
    • Asserts that a deceased body is not a public republic.
    • Highlights the need to respect individual autonomy and informed decision-making.

    Conclusions:

    • The state should not treat deceased bodies as public property.
    • Maximizing organ and tissue availability requires citizens to make informed and responsible choices.
    • Policy should encourage, or potentially require, citizens to decide on organ and tissue donation.