Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Establishing Safe and Consistent Moderate Intravenous (IV) Sedation Practices in Dental Education: A Protocol-Based Approach.

Journal of dental education·2026
Same author

Randomized double-blind inpatient study of a gluten-free diet for negative symptoms in people with schizophrenia.

Schizophrenia research·2026
Same author

The UCSC Genome Browser database: 2026 update.

Nucleic acids research·2025
Same author

Avasopasem manganese treatment for severe oral mucositis from chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced head and neck cancer: phase 3 randomized controlled trial (ROMAN).

EClinicalMedicine·2025
Same author

Age-related trends in eating pathology symptoms among transgender and gender-diverse adults.

Eating and weight disorders : EWD·2025
Same author

Community norms of the Eating Pathology Symptoms Inventory (EPSI) in transgender and gender-diverse adults.

Eating behaviors·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 16, 2026

Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Gynecologic Cancer
10:35

Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Gynecologic Cancer

Published on: April 17, 2012

Dynamic collimator optimization compared with fixed collimator angle in arc-based stereotactic radiotherapy: a

Christopher M Lee1, Gordon A Watson, Dennis D Leavitt

  • 1Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Utah, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Latter-Day Saints Hospital, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.

Neurosurgical Focus
|August 5, 2005
PubMed
Summary

Dynamic collimator optimization in stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) significantly reduces radiation dose to healthy peritumoral tissue. This method improves treatment precision and patient outcomes by minimizing irradiated tissue volume.

More Related Videos

Characterization of Recombination Effects in a Liquid Ionization Chamber Used for the Dosimetry of a Radiosurgical Accelerator
07:31

Characterization of Recombination Effects in a Liquid Ionization Chamber Used for the Dosimetry of a Radiosurgical Accelerator

Published on: May 10, 2014

Dynamic Lung Tumor Tracking for Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiation Therapy
08:17

Dynamic Lung Tumor Tracking for Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiation Therapy

Published on: June 7, 2015

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 16, 2026

Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Gynecologic Cancer
10:35

Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Gynecologic Cancer

Published on: April 17, 2012

Characterization of Recombination Effects in a Liquid Ionization Chamber Used for the Dosimetry of a Radiosurgical Accelerator
07:31

Characterization of Recombination Effects in a Liquid Ionization Chamber Used for the Dosimetry of a Radiosurgical Accelerator

Published on: May 10, 2014

Dynamic Lung Tumor Tracking for Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiation Therapy
08:17

Dynamic Lung Tumor Tracking for Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiation Therapy

Published on: June 7, 2015

Area of Science:

  • Radiation Oncology
  • Medical Physics

Background:

  • Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) utilizes precise radiation delivery for intracranial lesions.
  • Micromultileaf collimators (mMLCs) enable complex beam shaping in SRS.
  • Optimizing collimator positioning is crucial for minimizing dose to healthy tissues.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the impact of static versus dynamic collimator optimization using an mMLC in arc-based SRS.
  • To quantify the reduction in dose to healthy peritumoral tissue under different collimator strategies.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of 30 SRS patient plans using BrainLAB mMLC.
  • Comparison of three collimator optimization strategies: static 90-degree, static optimized per arc, and dynamic optimized every 10 degrees.
  • Quantitative comparison of dose-volume histograms for a 0.7-cm peritumoral tissue shell.

Main Results:

  • Both static and dynamic collimator optimization significantly reduced irradiated peritumoral tissue volume compared to fixed 90-degree static collimation.
  • Dynamic optimization (Strategy 3) showed greater reductions (up to 47.1%) than static optimization (up to 40.6%) at the 95% isodose level.
  • Serial dynamic optimization further decreased irradiated volume by 8.2%–16.1% compared to static optimization.

Conclusions:

  • Dynamic collimator optimization in arc-based SRS effectively reduces radiation exposure to healthy peritumoral tissue.
  • This approach enhances target conformality and represents a significant improvement in SRS planning.
  • Further development of smoothing function algorithms is needed for true dynamic collimation in SRS.