Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Causal propositions in clinical research and practice.

M S Kramer1, D A Lane

  • 1Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McGill University Faculty of Medicine, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
|June 1, 1992
PubMed
Summary

Understanding causation in health is key. This study defines three causal propositions—It Did, It Can, It Will—to bridge the gap between population-level research and individual clinical practice.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Stop and Go: Barriers and Facilitators to Care Home Research.

The Journal of frailty & aging·2023
Same author

Enhanced activity of an ADAMTS-13 variant (R568K/F592Y/R660K/Y661F/Y665F) against platelet agglutination in vitro and in a murine model of acute ischemic stroke.

Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH·2018
Same author

ADAMTS-13 and von Willebrand factor: a dynamic duo.

Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH·2017
Same author

Comparison of bleeding risk scores in patients with atrial fibrillation: insights from the RE-LY trial.

Journal of internal medicine·2017
Same author

Conformational quiescence of ADAMTS-13 prevents proteolytic promiscuity: reply.

Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH·2017
Same author

Conformational quiescence of ADAMTS-13 prevents proteolytic promiscuity.

Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH·2016

Area of Science:

  • Epidemiology
  • Clinical Research
  • Health Policy

Background:

  • Causation is fundamental to health sciences, but definitions vary between population-based research and individual clinical practice.
  • Epidemiological literature often focuses on causality criteria rather than definitions, creating a gap.
  • Population-level causality differs from individual-level causality, impacting decision-making.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To define three probabilistic causal propositions to bridge the gap between population and individual perspectives on causality.
  • To introduce a framework for understanding causality based on locus (individual/population) and time frame (past/future).

Main Methods:

  • Defined three causal propositions: retrodictive (It Did), potential (It Can), and predictive (It Will).

Related Experiment Videos

  • Differentiated propositions based on the outcome's occurrence (past/future) and the subject (individual/population).

    • Main Results:

    • Retrodictive propositions address past outcomes in individuals.
    • "Potential" propositions apply to populations, indicating capacity for an outcome.
    • "Predictive" propositions forecast future outcomes for individuals or populations.

    Conclusions:

    • Distinguishing these causal propositions can clarify health research and practice.
    • This framework helps avoid common errors in clinical and public health decision-making.
    • A nuanced understanding of causality improves the application of health evidence.