Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

MR-guided interventions for prostate cancer.

Ergin Atalar1, Cynthia Ménard

  • 1Department of Radiology, The Johns Hopkins University, 720 Rutland Avenue, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA. eatalar@jhu.edu

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Clinics of North America
|August 9, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

SAR-Efficient Sub-Volume Imaging Using Nonlinear Gradient Magnetic Fields.

Journal of imaging·2026
Same author

Deployment of a real-time prostate cancer confirmation system with Raman spectroscopy: fine-tuning versus test-time adaptation of 1D CNNs.

Biophotonics discovery·2026
Same author

Platform for the Evaluation of innovations in Radiation oncology through registry-based conduct of multi-centric pragmatic randomized trials: PERa implementation.

Trials·2026
Same author

Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen PET-Guided Salvage Radiotherapy-Precision or Prematurity?-Reply.

JAMA oncology·2026
Same author

EM Simulation Model of a Clinically-Used RF Head Coil at 7 T.

Magnetic resonance in medicine·2026
Same author

Assessing Quality and Adherence to PI-RADSv2.1 Minimum Technical Standards of Prostate MRI in NRG-GU005.

Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI·2025
Same journal

Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance: Innovation, Integration, and Clinical Impact.

Magnetic resonance imaging clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Advances and Innovations in Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

Magnetic resonance imaging clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

The Future of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance: Navigating Ultra-High and Low-Field Imaging (Part 2).

Magnetic resonance imaging clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Artificial Intelligence Applications in Cardiac MR Imaging.

Magnetic resonance imaging clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Climate Change and Globally Sustainable Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

Magnetic resonance imaging clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Strain Imaging in Heart Failure.

Magnetic resonance imaging clinics of North America·2026
See all related articles

Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging is becoming the preferred method for guiding prostate interventions like biopsies and thermal therapy. Advancements are overcoming previous challenges, making MR imaging crucial for prostate cancer diagnosis and treatment.

Area of Science:

  • Radiology
  • Medical Imaging
  • Oncology

Background:

  • Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging is the leading diagnostic tool for prostate anatomy and pathology.
  • Transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) is currently dominant for image guidance in prostate interventions due to practicality and cost.
  • Integrating diagnostic and interventional MR imaging faces challenges like real-time feedback, technical complexity, and scanner access limitations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review current strategies and future directions for MR imaging-guided prostate interventions.
  • To highlight the evolving role of MR imaging in diagnosing and treating prostate cancer.

Main Methods:

  • Review of clinical strategies for MR imaging-guided prostate interventions.
  • Discussion of coregistration of diagnostic MR imaging with TRUS or open scanner MR images.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Exploration of stereotactic needle interventions within conventional diagnostic scanners.

    • Main Results:

    • Two primary strategies for MR imaging guidance have been clinically demonstrated.
    • Ongoing research is developing techniques to establish MR imaging as the method of choice for direct procedural guidance.
    • MR imaging guidance shows promise for improving prostate cancer interventions.

    Conclusions:

    • MR imaging guidance is poised to play an increasingly significant role in prostate cancer diagnosis and treatment.
    • Advancements in MR imaging technology are overcoming previous limitations for interventional procedures.
    • The future of prostate cancer care will likely involve greater utilization of MR imaging guidance for interventions such as biopsy, brachytherapy, and thermal therapy.