Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 16, 2026

Nine-Grid Area Division Method: A New Ideal Bone Puncture Region for Percutaneous Vertebroplasty in Lumbar Spine
Published on: August 9, 2024
Intravertebral cleft sign on fat-suppressed contrast-enhanced MR: correlation with cement distribution pattern on
Masaki Oka1, Masaki Matsusako, Nobuo Kobayashi
1Department of Radiology, St Luke's International Hospital, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, Japan. okamasaki_1213@yahoo.com
Rationale And Objectives:
Filling intravertebral clefts during percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) is considered to be important for optimal pain control. It is often difficult to detect clefts on non-contrast MR and some fractures show a solid pattern distribution of injected cement without a cleft sign on non-contrast MR. In this study, we evaluated usefulness of fat-suppressed contrast-enhanced MR to predict a solid pattern distribution of injected cement on PVP.
Materials And Methods:
Twenty-six patients with 35 vertebral compression fractures due to osteoporosis were studied. We performed sagittal T1-weighted, T2-weighted and fat-suppressed contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images prior to PVP. First we evaluated the presence of fluid-filled or gas-containing clefts on non-contrast MR. Next we evaluated contrast-enhanced MR of the same vertebrae for the presence of cleft-shaped unenhanced areas within the diffuse enhancement area. We correlated MR findings with cement distribution patterns of injected cement.
Results:
Based on MR findings, 35 osteoporotic fractures were divided into 3 types. Type 1 (11 fractures, 31%): There were no clefts on non-contrast MR and no unenhanced areas on contrast-enhanced MR; Type 2 (13, 37%): There were no clefts on non-contrast MR but there were unenhanced areas on contrast-enhanced MR; Type 3 (13, 37%): There were clefts on non-contrast MR and unenhanced areas on contrast-enhanced MR. Of 35 osteoporotic fractures, thirteen vertebral fractures (37%) were noted to contain clefts on non-contrast MR, while 24 vertebral fractures (69%) contained unenhanced areas on contrast-enhanced MR. Cement distributed as a solid pattern within clefts or unenhanced areas in all fractures with them.
Conclusion:
Fat-suppressed contrast-enhanced MR is useful to predict a solid pattern distribution of injected cement prior to PVP.