Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Forward/up directional incompatibilities during cursor placement within graphical user interfaces.

James G Phillips1, Thomas J Triggs, James W Meehan

  • 1Psychology Department, Monash University, VIC 3800, Australia. Jim.Phillips@med.monash.edu.au

Ergonomics
|August 10, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Factors Associated with Assistance and Baiting in Response to Threat of Suicide in an Online Forum.

Cyberpsychology, behavior and social networking·2026
Same author

Decisional style, sleepiness, and online responsiveness.

Ergonomics·2023
Same author

Accuracy-sensitisation promotes the sharing of pro- (but not anti-) vaccine information.

Psychology & health·2023
Same author

Incompatibility Influences Cursor Placement When Pointing to Images of Cups.

Human factors·2022
Same author

High achievers, Schadenfreude and Gluckschmerz in New Zealanders and Chinese.

PsyCh journal·2022
Same author

Remote detection of Cannabis-related impairments in performance?

Psychopharmacology·2022
Same journal

Identification of systemic barriers, facilitators and adaptations to effective record-keeping: a South African primary healthcare clinic case study.

Ergonomics·2026
Same journal

Layer-specific facial soft-tissue thickness in 1174 Chinese adults: Implications for finite-element headforms and ergonomic design.

Ergonomics·2026
Same journal

The dual effects of information presentation speed on operator performance in dynamic tasks: a study in supervisory control and data acquisition interfaces.

Ergonomics·2026
Same journal

Evaluating generative AI teaching assistants in simulated learning environments: how instructor type and support type affect students' perceptions.

Ergonomics·2026
Same journal

Swipe smart, not hard: hand health of smartphone users in a university population.

Ergonomics·2026
Same journal

Couriers' work-related musculoskeletal disorders and psychological distress: Insights for work errors and traffic safety.

Ergonomics·2026
See all related articles

Indirect control in graphical user interfaces causes directional incompatibilities, slowing cursor movements. Direct control interfaces, like touch screens, improve cursor trajectory efficiency.

Area of Science:

  • Human-Computer Interaction
  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Usability Engineering

Background:

  • Graphical user interfaces (GUIs) often involve indirect control, where physical movements do not directly map to cursor actions.
  • Directional incompatibilities can arise from the mapping between display and control, potentially impacting user performance.
  • Previous research suggests direct manipulation interfaces may offer advantages in efficiency and intuitiveness.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the impact of directional incompatibilities between display and control on cursor movement efficiency in a four-choice reaction time task.
  • To compare performance across different controller directness (indirect vs. direct) and orientation compatibility.
  • To identify specific movement characteristics affected by display-control incompatibilities.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Methods:

  • A four-choice reaction time task was employed with 12 participants.
  • A 2x2x2 experimental design manipulated controller directness (screen cursor vs. graphics tablet), orientation compatibility (horizontal vs. vertical), and motion axis (left/right vs. up/down).
  • Movement trajectories, including latency, acceleration, and deceleration phases, were analyzed.

Main Results:

  • Directional incompatibilities between display and controller significantly slowed cursor movement and prolonged accelerative phases.
  • Indirect control relationships resulted in less efficient movements, characterized by prolonged decelerative phases and undershooting on the up/down axis.
  • Controller orientation compatibility did not significantly affect response latencies, possibly due to the nature of upward movements in the visual field.

Conclusions:

  • Indirect control schemes in GUIs can lead to significant performance decrements and less efficient cursor trajectories.
  • Direct control devices, such as touch screens, are recommended for enhancing cursor movement efficiency.
  • Understanding display-control mappings is crucial for designing intuitive and efficient human-computer interaction systems.