Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Concept Videos

Computed Tomography01:10

Computed Tomography

9.6K
Tomography refers to imaging by sections. Computed tomography (CT) is a non-invasive imaging technique that uses computers to analyze several cross-sectional X-rays to reveal minute details about structures in the body.
The technique was invented in the 1970s and is based on the principle that as X-rays pass through the body, they are absorbed or reflected at different levels. In the technique, a patient lies on a motorized platform while a computerized axial tomography (CAT) scanner rotates...
9.6K
Imaging Studies III: Computed Tomography01:27

Imaging Studies III: Computed Tomography

725
DefinitionComputed Tomography (CT) of the genitourinary (GU) tract is a non-invasive imaging modality that utilizes X-rays and computer processing to generate detailed cross-sectional images of the urinary system, encompassing the kidneys, ureters, bladder, and adjacent structures such as the adrenal glands.PurposeCT scans of the GU tract serve several diagnostic and therapeutic purposes, including:Diagnosis of Urinary Tract Diseases: Detects kidney stones, tumors, cysts, and congenital...
725

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Acidity of atmospheric aerosols.

Environmental science & technology·2012
Same author

Atmospheric chemistry of aldehydes: enhanced peroxyacetyl nitrate formation from ethanol-fueled vehicular emissions.

Environmental science & technology·2011
Same author

An ethnohistorical consideration of the role of Antilocapra americana in the lives of indiginous peoples and American pioneers.

Plains anthropologist·2006
Same author

Rates of conversion of sulfur dioxide to sulfate in a scrubbed power plant plume.

Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association (1995)·2001
Same author

Chemical composition of fine particles in the Tennessee Valley region.

Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association (1995)·2000
Same author

The evolution of particles in the plume from a large coal-fired boiler with flue gas desulfurization.

Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association (1995)·2000
Same journal

Noncontrast Abbreviated MRI for Post-TACE Treatment Response Monitoring of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Based on Ancillary Features from LI-RADS.

Radiology·2026
Same journal

Response Evaluation Criteria in Bone Metastases: Performance and Association of Response Classifications with Survival Outcomes.

Radiology·2026
Same journal

Entropy for Prediction of MACEs in Myocarditis: A Cardiac MRI-based Biomarker of Myocardial Tissue Heterogeneity.

Radiology·2026
Same journal

AI for Radiology: A Primer Part II. Interacting with AI Results.

Radiology·2026
Same journal

Hyperdense Capsule Sign at Noncontrast CT as an Indication for Middle Meningeal Artery Embolization for Nonacute Subdural Hematomas: A MAGIC-MT Trial Post Hoc Analysis.

Radiology·2026
Same journal

Sawtooth Cardiomyopathy: The Tiger Heart.

Radiology·2026
See all related articles
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 5, 2026

Intermediate Strain Rate Material Characterization with Digital Image Correlation
07:59

Intermediate Strain Rate Material Characterization with Digital Image Correlation

Published on: March 1, 2019

7.7K

Mammographic unit compression force: acceptance test and quality control protocols.

R L Tanner1

  • 1Department of Radiology, University of Tennessee, Memphis 38163.

Radiology
|July 1, 1992
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Mammography compression is crucial for clear images and lower radiation dose. Quality control testing and force indicators are needed to ensure consistent and safe breast compression during mammography procedures.

More Related Videos

Clinical Imaging of Microwave Mammography
05:28

Clinical Imaging of Microwave Mammography

Published on: November 14, 2025

400
Measurement of Compressive Stress-Strain Response at Small-Strains
02:58

Measurement of Compressive Stress-Strain Response at Small-Strains

Published on: December 5, 2025

428

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 5, 2026

Intermediate Strain Rate Material Characterization with Digital Image Correlation
07:59

Intermediate Strain Rate Material Characterization with Digital Image Correlation

Published on: March 1, 2019

7.7K
Clinical Imaging of Microwave Mammography
05:28

Clinical Imaging of Microwave Mammography

Published on: November 14, 2025

400
Measurement of Compressive Stress-Strain Response at Small-Strains
02:58

Measurement of Compressive Stress-Strain Response at Small-Strains

Published on: December 5, 2025

428

Area of Science:

  • Radiology
  • Medical Imaging
  • Biomedical Engineering

Background:

  • Firm breast compression in mammography is vital for reducing radiation dose, enhancing image quality, and improving detection of abnormalities.
  • Many current mammography units lack adequate compression force indicators, leading to variability and potential issues.
  • Existing systems exhibit inconsistent force application, reproducibility problems, and mechanical failures in release mechanisms.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To outline essential quality control procedures for mammography compression systems.
  • To recommend specific measurements for evaluating compression force, stability, and reproducibility.
  • To highlight the need for improved compression force indication and control in mammography equipment.

Main Methods:

  • Detailed procedures for initial acceptance testing and ongoing quality control (QC) of mammography compression devices.
  • Recommended measurements include applied force levels (manual and automatic), force stability, reproducibility, and dependence on angulation and breast size.
  • Evaluation of compression system condition, operation, and release mechanisms, along with specified test equipment and measurement frequencies.

Main Results:

  • Identified significant variability and lack of reproducibility in compression force levels across different mammography units.
  • Observed issues with force variations over time, with angle, and in different regions of the compression device.
  • Documented mechanical failures, including jammed release mechanisms, in some mammography units.

Conclusions:

  • Emphasizes the critical need for robust quality control measures for mammography compression systems.
  • Recommends that manufacturers integrate reliable compression-force gauges and offer both manual and variable-force automatic modes.
  • Highlights the importance of consistent and accurate breast compression for patient safety and diagnostic efficacy in mammography.