Search research articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Strengthening some common multiple test procedures for discrete data.

¹Rhône-Poulenc Rorer Central Research, Horsham, PA 19044.

Statistics in Medicine

|February 28, 1992

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Testing for individual and population equivalence based on the proportion of similar responses.

Statistics in medicine·1996

Same author

On closed test procedures for dose-response analysis.

Statistics in medicine·1994

See all related articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

This study modifies multiple testing procedures for discrete distributions, addressing conservativeness. The new methods achieve closer type I error rates, resulting in more powerful statistical tests.

Area of Science:

Statistics
Statistical Inference

Background:

Standard multiple testing procedures often exhibit conservativeness when applied to discrete distributions.
The exact nominal levels of these procedures are frequently unattainable with discrete data, leading to reduced statistical power.

Purpose of the Study:

To propose modifications to common multiple testing procedures for discrete distributions.
To enhance the accuracy of type I error rates in multiple hypothesis testing scenarios involving discrete data.
To increase the power of statistical tests by achieving type I error rates closer to nominal levels.

Main Methods:

Modification of existing multiple test procedures.
Analysis of type I error rates under discrete distributions.
Comparison of power between amended and standard procedures.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

The amended procedures achieve actual type I error rates substantially closer to the nominal levels compared to standard methods.
The proposed modifications lead to statistically more powerful tests for discrete data.

Conclusions:

Modified multiple testing procedures offer a more accurate and powerful approach for discrete data analysis.
These enhanced procedures can improve the reliability and sensitivity of hypothesis testing in fields utilizing discrete statistical models.