Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Strengthening some common multiple test procedures for discrete data.

D M Rom1

  • 1Rhône-Poulenc Rorer Central Research, Horsham, PA 19044.

Statistics in Medicine
|February 28, 1992
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Testing for individual and population equivalence based on the proportion of similar responses.

Statistics in medicine·1996
Same author

On closed test procedures for dose-response analysis.

Statistics in medicine·1994
See all related articles

This study modifies multiple testing procedures for discrete distributions, addressing conservativeness. The new methods achieve closer type I error rates, resulting in more powerful statistical tests.

Area of Science:

  • Statistics
  • Statistical Inference

Background:

  • Standard multiple testing procedures often exhibit conservativeness when applied to discrete distributions.
  • The exact nominal levels of these procedures are frequently unattainable with discrete data, leading to reduced statistical power.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose modifications to common multiple testing procedures for discrete distributions.
  • To enhance the accuracy of type I error rates in multiple hypothesis testing scenarios involving discrete data.
  • To increase the power of statistical tests by achieving type I error rates closer to nominal levels.

Main Methods:

  • Modification of existing multiple test procedures.
  • Analysis of type I error rates under discrete distributions.
  • Comparison of power between amended and standard procedures.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • The amended procedures achieve actual type I error rates substantially closer to the nominal levels compared to standard methods.
  • The proposed modifications lead to statistically more powerful tests for discrete data.

Conclusions:

  • Modified multiple testing procedures offer a more accurate and powerful approach for discrete data analysis.
  • These enhanced procedures can improve the reliability and sensitivity of hypothesis testing in fields utilizing discrete statistical models.