Related Experiment Videos
The content and value of letters of recommendation in the resident candidate evaluative process
1Department of Surgery, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, Springfield, Illinois, USA.
Purpose:
To determine the content and value of letters of recommendation (LOR) in the selection of residents for general surgery training.
Methods:
During the 1999 application process, we evaluated the source, content, and usefulness of 966 LOR for 288 viable applicants to our program. Each letter was reviewed to determine if the author had clinical contact with the student and whether the student's fund of knowledge, clinical achievements, psychomotor skills, and personal characteristics were described. The use and type of a "single word" summary was also noted. The program director then determined if the LOR was helpful in evaluating the student.
Participants:
All LOR in the application materials of candidates applying to the General Surgery Residency of the University of Arizona.
Results:
All of the candidates submitted 3 LOR and 34% submitted 4. The average length was 13.7 (range, 4 to 36) sentences. Department chairs wrote LOR for 66% of the students, and these comprised 20% of the total LOR. Program directors, division chiefs, and clerkship directors wrote 16%, whereas other general surgery faculty contributed 40%. In 17% of the LOR, no evidence of direct clinical supervision could be found. Personal characteristics were described in 89% of the letters, but reference to psychomotor skills occurred in only 27%. In 58% of the LOR, a single adjective was used to describe the students; of these, "outstanding" (or equivalent) was used in 37% and "excellent" (or equivalent) was used in 38%. Meaningful comparison to student colleagues appeared in 11%. In our program director's opinion, 24% of the LOR were helpful in the evaluation process. The department chair's letters were helpful only 19% of the time.
Conclusions:
Letters of recommendation are imprecise indicators of student performance for resident candidate evaluation. A "standardized LOR" may help provide a consistent and more objective evaluative tool, and the APDS should consider its development for future selection processes.
Related Concept Videos
01:08Role of Communication in the Nursing Process III: Evaluation and Documentation
03:00Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification
01:15Nursing Evaluation
Section...
01:20Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation
Nurses can use several methods to evaluate patient outcomes. For example, oral questions can assess cognitive learning, patient...
01:11Guidelines for Writing Outcome
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care evaluation by...
01:16Critical Region, Critical Values and Significance Level
In hypothesis testing, a sample statistic is converted to a test statistic using z, t, or chi-square distribution. A critical region is an area under the curve in probability distributions demarcated by the critical value. When the test statistic falls in this region, it suggests that the null hypothesis must be rejected. As this region contains all those values of the test...