Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Classification and nomenclature of retrotransposable elements.

P Capy1

  • 1Laboratoire Populations, Génétique et Evolution, CNRS, Gif/Yvette, France. capy@pge.cnrs-gif.fr

Cytogenetic and Genome Research
|August 12, 2005
PubMed
Summary

Reviewing retrotransposable element classification reveals outdated systems. A unified, common classification is needed to accommodate new discoveries and address existing discrepancies in retrotransposon and viral element categorization.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

[Not Available].

Annales de genetique et de selection animale·2012
Same author

Genetic properties of North African Drosophila melanogaster and comparison with European and Afrotropical populations.

Genetique, selection, evolution·2012
Same author

Thoracic trident pigmentation in Drosophila melanogaster: Differentiation of geographical populations.

Genetique, selection, evolution·2012
Same author

Alcohol tolerance and Adh gene frequencies in European and African populations of Drosophila melanogaster.

Genetique, selection, evolution·2012
Same author

The mariner transposable element in natural populations of Drosophila simulans.

Heredity·2008
Same author

Revisiting horizontal transfer of transposable elements in Drosophila.

Heredity·2008

Area of Science:

  • Genetics
  • Molecular Biology
  • Bioinformatics

Background:

  • Retrotransposable elements (REs) are mobile genetic elements with significant impact on genome evolution.
  • Existing classification systems for REs, such as Capy et al. (1997b) and Hull (2001), present challenges.
  • Discrepancies arise particularly with DIRS-like and Bel-like retrotransposons.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review and compare current classification and nomenclature systems for retrotransposable elements.
  • To identify limitations and inconsistencies in existing RE classification schemes.
  • To highlight the necessity for a universally accepted classification system for retrotransposable elements.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of retrotransposable element classification systems.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Comparative analysis of the Capy et al. (1997b) and Hull (2001) proposals.
  • Discussion of problematic element groups within current classifications.

    • Main Results:

    • The Capy et al. (1997b) classification is outdated due to the discovery of new elements.
    • The Hull (2001) classification, based on viral classification, is not suitable for DNA-based elements.
    • Specific challenges exist in classifying DIRS-like and Bel-like retrotransposon groups.

    Conclusions:

    • Current retrotransposable element classification systems are inadequate.
    • A revised and unified classification is essential for accurate nomenclature and understanding.
    • A general, common classification system is urgently required for the field.