Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 8, 2026
Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty
Published on: July 5, 2011
Ipsilateral shoulder and elbow replacements: on the risk of periprosthetic fracture
D Plausinis1, C Greaves, W D Regan
1Department of Orthopaedics, University of British Columbia, 910 West 10th Ave., Vancouver, BC, Canada V5Z 4E3. d_plausinis@hotmail.com
Background:
Ipsilateral shoulder and elbow replacements may leave only a short segment of bone bridging the two implants in the humerus. The potential for high stress concentrations as a result of this geometry has been a concern with regard to periprosthetic fracture, especially with osteoporotic bone. The study aims to determine the optimum length of the bone-bridge between shoulder and elbow humeral implants, and to assess the effect of filling the canal with cement.
Methods:
A three-dimensional finite element model was used to compare the stresses between a humerus with a solitary prosthesis and a humerus with both proximal and distal cemented prostheses. The length of the bone-bridge and the effect of filling the canal with cement were studied under bending and torsion.
Findings:
Gradual load transfer from prosthesis to bone was observed for all cases, and no stress concentration was evident. The length of the bone-bridge had no deleterious effect on stresses in the humerus, and filling the canal with cement did not appreciably decrease the loads carried by the humerus.
Interpretation:
The length of the bone-bridge between stem tips has little effect on the resultant stresses in the humerus. Filling the canal with cement adds little benefit to the structural integrity of the humerus. Ipsilateral shoulder and elbow prostheses may be considered independent of one another in terms of risk of periprosthetic fracture.
