Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Determining rigid body transformation parameters from ill-conditioned spatial marker co-ordinates.

A B Carman1, P D Milburn

  • 1School of Physiotherapy, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand. allan.carman@otago.ac.nz

Journal of Biomechanics
|August 16, 2005
PubMed
Summary

This study evaluated methods for calculating body segment orientation, finding Veldpaus et al. superior for marker-based motion analysis. Optimal marker placement is crucial for accurate orientation parameter calculation.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Training habits and injuries of masters' level football players: a preliminary report.

Physical therapy in sport : official journal of the Association of Chartered Physiotherapists in Sports Medicine·2009
Same author

Epidemiology of cervical spine abnormalities in asymptomatic adult professional rugby union players using static and dynamic MRI protocols: 2002 to 2006.

British journal of sports medicine·2008
Same author

Dynamic coordinate data for describing muscle-tendon paths: a mathematical approach.

Journal of biomechanics·2005
Same author

Effect of premanipulative tests on vertebral artery and internal carotid artery blood flow: a pilot study.

Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics·1999
Same author

The nature and circumstances of tackle injuries in rugby union.

Journal of science and medicine in sport·1999
Same author

Warm-up effect on active and passive arthrometric assessment of knee laxity.

Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation·1999

Area of Science:

  • Biomechanics
  • Motion Analysis
  • culoskeletal Kinematics

Background:

  • Calculating three-dimensional body segment orientation relies on body-fixed marker coordinates.
  • Marker distribution symmetry can lead to ill-conditioning and unstable orientation parameters.
  • Existing methods vary in performance based on marker set quality.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate and compare established methods (Veldpaus, Challis, Andriacchi) for calculating segment orientation parameters.
  • To introduce and evaluate a novel fourth approach for orientation parameter calculation.
  • To assess method performance across a range of marker set conditions, from well-defined to ill-conditioned.

Main Methods:

  • Evaluated four methods for calculating body-fixed axis system orientation parameters.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Compared root mean square error of reconstructed marker coordinates to verify optimal solutions.
  • Tested methods with marker sets exhibiting varying degrees of symmetry and ill-conditioning.

    • Main Results:

    • No single method consistently provided optimal results for all orientation parameters.
    • The Veldpaus et al. method demonstrated consistent results and ease of implementation.
    • The novel fourth approach was reliable except for highly ill-conditioned markers, but computationally complex.
    • Challis's method was suitable only for well-conditioned marker sets.
    • Andriacchi et al.'s method yielded approximate results compared to least squares.

    Conclusions:

    • Method selection for orientation parameter calculation depends on marker set quality.
    • The Veldpaus et al. method is recommended for its balance of accuracy and practicality.
    • Further research is needed to refine computationally difficult but potentially robust methods.