Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Evaluation frameworks for nursing informatics.

Leanne M Currie1

  • 1School of Nursing, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA. lmc2007@columbia.edu

International Journal of Medical Informatics
|August 16, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Web-Based Group Photovoice Through the Lens of Survivors of Critical Illness Recovery: Photovoice Qualitative Pilot Study.

JMIR formative research·2026
Same author

The role of family caregivers in critical illness survivor recovery at home: A qualitative study.

Journal of health services research & policy·2025
Same author

The Impact of a Novel Methodological Process for Needling Scars, Fascia, and Muscles in the Management of Myofascial Dysfunction and Chronic Pain in a Population Living With Social and Health Inequities: Quantitative Findings From a Longitudinal Observational Pilot Study.

Pain research & management·2025
Same author

From hospital to home: A heightened window of vulnerability post-critical illness.

PloS one·2025
Same author

Addressing technology-mediated stigma in sexual health-related digital platforms: Insights from design team members.

PLOS digital health·2025
Same author

Relationship between critical illness recovery and social determinants of health: a multiperspective qualitative study in British Columbia, Canada.

BMJ open·2024
Same journal

Integrating clinical decision support systems in pediatric oncology: A scoping review of applications, implementation gaps, and management Implications.

International journal of medical informatics·2026
Same journal

Understanding digital health capability of allied health professionals - a mixed-methods study with content validity analysis.

International journal of medical informatics·2026
Same journal

On-premises open-source large language models for privacy-preserving multimodal depression screening.

International journal of medical informatics·2026
Same journal

Data mining methods, tasks, and algorithms for adverse drug reaction analysis in pharmacovigilance: A scoping review.

International journal of medical informatics·2026
Same journal

Development and validation of an interpretable machine learning model for predicting systemic inflammatory response syndrome after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A multicenter study.

International journal of medical informatics·2026
Same journal

Prompt engineering experiment on ChatGPT's ability to recommend orthopedic surgeons.

International journal of medical informatics·2026
See all related articles

Evaluating healthcare informatics systems requires both qualitative and quantitative methods. This paper reviews existing frameworks, highlighting their strengths, weaknesses, and recommended qualitative research approaches for system development and implementation.

Area of Science:

  • Health Informatics
  • Research Methodology
  • Information Systems Evaluation

Background:

  • Rigorous evaluation of informatics applications in healthcare is crucial for understanding system impact.
  • While quantitative methods are common, qualitative methods are increasingly used in formative and summative research phases.
  • Existing evaluation frameworks emphasize the need for mixed methods in informatics development and post-implementation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To examine the strengths and weaknesses of published informatics evaluation frameworks.
  • To enumerate the qualitative research methods employed within these frameworks.
  • To provide insights into the optimal use of qualitative methods in healthcare informatics evaluation.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of published informatics evaluation frameworks.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of the strengths and weaknesses of each framework.
  • Categorization and enumeration of qualitative research methods utilized in each framework.

    • Main Results:

    • Different evaluation frameworks offer varying recommendations on the timing, type, and application of qualitative methods.
    • Each framework possesses unique strengths and limitations regarding comprehensive informatics system evaluation.
    • A diverse range of qualitative research methods are currently in use across different frameworks.

    Conclusions:

    • A comprehensive approach integrating qualitative and quantitative methods is essential for robust informatics system evaluation.
    • Understanding the nuances of different evaluation frameworks can guide researchers in selecting appropriate methods.
    • Further research may be needed to refine recommendations for qualitative method application in healthcare informatics.