Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 12, 2026
10:08
Multiplexed Single-molecule Force Proteolysis Measurements Using Magnetic Tweezers
Published on: July 25, 2012
Multiple-bond kinetics from single-molecule pulling experiments: evidence for multiple NCAM bonds
E J Hukkanen1, J A Wieland, A Gewirth
1Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana-Champaign, IL, USA.
Biophysical Journal
|August 16, 2005
Summary
Researchers quantified single neural cell adhesion molecule (NCAM) bond kinetics using atomic force microscopy. A double-bond model accurately describes NCAM bond rupture, revealing key kinetic parameters for protein interactions.
Area of Science:
- Biophysics
- Molecular Biology
- Cell Adhesion
Background:
- Neural cell adhesion molecules (NCAMs) mediate cell-cell interactions crucial for neural development.
- Understanding the mechanical properties of single NCAM bonds is essential for elucidating their function.
- Previous studies suggested NCAMs form multiple bonds, but their kinetic parameters remained largely uncharacterized.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the kinetic parameters of single homophilic protein-protein bonds between neural cell adhesion molecules (NCAMs).
- To develop and validate an analytical approach for obtaining rupture kinetics from single-molecule pulling experiments.
- To investigate the applicability of single-bond versus double-bond models in describing NCAM bond dissociation.
Main Methods:
- Utilized atomic force microscopy (AFM) to measure the forced dissociation of single NCAM-NCAM protein bonds.
- Applied single-molecule pulling experiments to obtain bond breakage frequency distributions.
- Analyzed rupture data at varying loading rates using single-bond and double-bond microscopic models.
Main Results:
- Developed a systematic procedure to derive single protein bond rupture kinetics from breakage frequency distributions.
- The single-bond model indicated sensitivity to the distance to the transition state and molecular spring constant.
- A double-bond microscopic model, assuming two independent NCAM-NCAM bonds, provided a more accurate description of breakage frequency distributions, especially at high loading rates.
Conclusions:
- The kinetic parameters of single NCAM bonds can be accurately determined using AFM and advanced analytical models.
- A double-bond model is necessary to fully capture the rupture dynamics of NCAM-NCAM interactions, consistent with prior surface-force measurements.
- This work provides critical insights into the mechanical stability and interaction mechanisms of neural cell adhesion molecules.
Related Concept Videos
01:13¹H NMR: Complex Splitting
A proton M that is coupled to a proton X results in doublet signals for M. However, NMR-active nuclei can be simultaneously coupled to more than one nonequivalent nucleus. When M is coupled to a second proton A, such as in styrene oxide, each peak in the doublet is split into another doublet.
Splitting diagrams or splitting tree diagrams are routinely used to depict such complex couplings. While drawing splitting diagrams, the splitting with the larger coupling constant is usually applied first.
Splitting diagrams or splitting tree diagrams are routinely used to depict such complex couplings. While drawing splitting diagrams, the splitting with the larger coupling constant is usually applied first.
00:52¹H NMR of Conformationally Flexible Molecules: Temporal Resolution
At room temperature, the chair conformer of cyclohexane undergoes rapid ring flipping between two equivalent chair conformers at a rate of approximately 105 times per second. These two chair conformers are in equilibrium. The rapid ring flipping results in the interconversion of the axial proton to an equatorial proton and an equatorial to the axial proton. Such interconversions are too rapid and cannot be detected on the NMR timescale. Hence, the NMR spectrometer cannot distinguish between the...
01:13¹H NMR Signal Multiplicity: Splitting Patterns
When protons A and X are coupled, their nuclear spin energy levels are slightly modified. This is because the energy required to excite proton A to a spin state parallel to proton X is slightly different from the energy required for it to become anti-parallel to spin X. Consequently, there are two possible excitation frequencies for A (A1 and A2), depending on the spin state of X, and vice versa. The mutual nature of coupling implies that the difference between frequencies A1 and A2, indicated...
01:08Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview
In bromoethane, the three methyl protons are coupled to the two methylene protons that are three bonds away. In accordance with the n+1 rule, the signal from the methyl protons is split into three peaks with 1:2:1 relative intensities. The methylene protons appear as a quartet, with the relative intensities of 1:3:3:1.
Qualitatively, any spin plus-half nucleus polarizes the spins of its electrons to the minus-half state. Consequently, the paired electron in the hydrogen–carbon bond must have a...
Qualitatively, any spin plus-half nucleus polarizes the spins of its electrons to the minus-half state. Consequently, the paired electron in the hydrogen–carbon bond must have a...
01:17Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling
Coupling interactions are strongest between NMR-active nuclei bonded to each other, where spin information can be transmitted directly through the pair of bonding electrons. While nuclei polarize their electrons to the opposite spins, the bonding electron pair has opposite spins. Configurations with antiparallel nuclear spins are expected to be lower in energy. When coupling makes antiparallel states more favorable, J is considered to have a positive value. The one-bond coupling constant, 1J,...
01:27¹H NMR: Long-Range Coupling
The coupling interactions of nuclei across four or more bonds are usually weak, with J values less than 1 Hz. While these are usually not observed in spectra, the presence of multiple bonds along the coupling pathway can result in observable long-range coupling.
In alkenes, spin information is communicated via σ–π overlap, as seen in allylic (four-bond) and homoallylic (five-bond) couplings. These coupling interactions are stronger when the σ bond is parallel to the alkene π orbitals.
In alkenes, spin information is communicated via σ–π overlap, as seen in allylic (four-bond) and homoallylic (five-bond) couplings. These coupling interactions are stronger when the σ bond is parallel to the alkene π orbitals.