Related Experiment Videos
Measuring paternal discrepancy and its public health consequences.
Mark A Bellis1, Karen Hughes, Sara Hughes
1Centre for Public Health, Faculty of Health and Applied Social Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Castle House, North Street, Liverpool L3 2AY, UK. m.a.bellis@livjm.ac.uk
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
|August 16, 2005
Summary
Paternal discrepancy (PD), where a child
Area of Science:
- Forensic genetics
- Public health
- Behavioral science
Background:
- Paternal discrepancy (PD) is the identification of a biological father different from the one believed to be.
- Existing literature presents highly variable PD rates, ranging from 0.8% to 30% across studies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review published evidence on the prevalence of paternal discrepancy.
- To examine the public health consequences associated with both the identification and non-identification of PD.
- To identify demographic and social factors associated with an increased risk of PD.
Main Methods:
- Systematic review of published literature on paternal discrepancy.
- Analysis of genetic and behavioral studies to identify risk factors.
- Evaluation of public health implications based on existing evidence.
Main Results:
- Median PD rate across 17 studies was 3.7%, with a wide range (0.8%–30%).
- Higher risk of PD is associated with younger conception age, socioeconomic deprivation, non-marital relationships, and specific cultural contexts.
- Consequences of PD disclosure include family disruption and violence; non-disclosure leads to genetic misinformation and paternal uncertainty.
Conclusions:
- Increased use of DNA testing in clinical and judicial settings will likely lead to more PD identifications.
- The implications of PD for genetic information in healthcare, insurance, and personal decisions necessitate urgent attention.
- There is a critical need for guidelines on the ethical and effective disclosure of paternal discrepancy.