Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Defining life: the ethical context for human quality questions.

M R Brett-Crowther1

  • 1Brett-Crowther Environmental Consultants, Gloucester, England.

The Mankind Quarterly
|October 1, 1986
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Assistance in Georgia.

British dental journalยท1998
See all related articles

Ethics, medicine, and law struggle to define human quality due to ethical misunderstandings and scientific uncertainties. This paper examines eugenics, abortion, and euthanasia to explore these complex issues.

Area of Science:

  • Bioethics
  • Medical Law
  • Philosophy of Medicine

Background:

  • The intersection of ethics, medicine, and law faces challenges in establishing criteria for human quality assessments.
  • Ethical considerations are often misinterpreted or omitted in discussions, complicating the development of appropriate standards.
  • Significant scientific unknowns further impede the creation of robust criteria for evaluating human quality.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the difficulties in formulating criteria for human quality questions.
  • To explore the roles of ethics, medicine, and law in addressing complex bioethical issues.
  • To survey the ethical and legal dimensions of eugenics, abortion, and euthanasia.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review and critical analysis of ethical frameworks.
Keywords:
Death and EuthanasiaGenetics and ReproductionIn re DR. v. Arthur

Related Experiment Videos

  • Examination of legal precedents and medical advancements related to human quality.
  • Case study analysis of eugenics, abortion, and euthanasia.

    • Main Results:

    • Current ethical and legal frameworks are insufficient for defining human quality due to inherent ambiguities and scientific uncertainties.
    • Misconstrued or excluded ethical principles hinder objective assessments.
    • The scientific basis for many 'human quality' debates remains speculative and evolving.

    Conclusions:

    • There is a critical need for clearer ethical guidelines and a better understanding of scientific unknowns to address human quality debates.
    • Re-evaluating the integration of ethics within medical and legal discourse is essential.
    • The complexities surrounding eugenics, abortion, and euthanasia highlight the ongoing challenges in bioethical decision-making.