Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Anterior spinal column augmentation with injectable bone cements.

Jorrit-Jan Verlaan1, F Cumhur Oner, Wouter J A Dhert

  • 1Department of Orthopaedics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584CX Utrecht, The Netherlands. j.j.verlaan@chir.azu.nl

Biomaterials
|August 17, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Correction: Comparison of <i>in vitro</i> and <i>in vivo</i> toxicity of bupivacaine in musculoskeletal applications.

Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

Patient-reported outcomes following operative and nonoperative management of A3 versus A4 thoracolumbar burst fractures.

Journal of neurosurgery. Spine·2026
Same author

Perspectives and challenges of multidisciplinary collaboration in the treatment of metastatic spinal disease: Insights from an international survey.

Neuro-oncology practice·2026
Same author

Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) and Long-Term Prospective Validation of the AO Spine PROST (Patient Reported Outcome Spine Trauma).

Global spine journal·2026
Same author

Functional Outcomes Between Surgical and Nonsurgical Treatment for Neurologically Intact Patients With Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures as Measured by the AO Spine PROST.

Spine·2026
Same author

Enhanced Recovery After Lumbar Fusion Surgery: An International Survey on Current Practice.

Global spine journal·2026

Vertebroplasty and balloon vertebroplasty offer effective pain relief for vertebral fractures. These minimally invasive procedures use bone cement to stabilize fractures, with balloon vertebroplasty potentially offering better outcomes.

Area of Science:

  • Orthopedics
  • Neurosurgery
  • Radiology

Background:

  • Vertebral fractures, from osteoporosis or trauma, cause pain and disability.
  • Traditional treatments like bedrest and analgesics are limited.
  • Vertebroplasty emerged as a minimally invasive alternative.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To describe vertebroplasty and balloon vertebroplasty techniques.
  • To review indications, applications, and limitations of bone cements.
  • To analyze the clinical results and complications of these procedures.

Main Methods:

  • Percutaneous injection of bone cement into vertebral bodies.
  • Use of inflatable bone tamps for cavity creation (balloon vertebroplasty).
  • Comparison of polymethyl methacrylate and calcium phosphate cements.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Vertebroplasty and balloon vertebroplasty provide immediate pain relief in 85-95% of patients.
  • Balloon vertebroplasty may reduce cement leakage and improve vertebral alignment.
  • Indications include osteoporotic fractures, myeloma, hemangioma, metastasis, and traumatic burst fractures.

Conclusions:

  • Vertebroplasty and balloon vertebroplasty are effective for pain relief and stabilization.
  • Careful consideration of cement types and procedural techniques is essential.
  • Serious complications are rare but include neurological deficit and pulmonary embolism.