Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Minimum audible angle, just noticeable interaural differences and speech intelligibility with bilateral cochlear

Pascal Senn1, Martin Kompis, Mattheus Vischer

  • 1Department of ENT, Head and Neck Surgery, Inselspital, University of Berne, Berne, Switzerland.

Audiology & Neuro-Otology
|August 17, 2005
PubMed
Summary

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Introducing a translationally relevant mouse model of radiosurgery-induced unilateral hearing loss.

Frontiers in neuroscience·2026
Same author

[Innovation in the radiotherapy management of vestibular schwannomas].

Revue medicale suisse·2026
Same author

Evaluation of a New, Community-Based Screening Program to Detect Hearing Loss in Adult Childhood Cancer Survivors in Switzerland: Findings From the HEAR Study.

Pediatric blood & cancer·2026
Same author

Development of a Speech Intelligibility Test for Children in Swiss German Dialects.

Audiology research·2026
Same author

Altered parietal multisensory integration in chronic tinnitus during closed-loop real-time fMRI auditory downregulation.

NeuroImage. Clinical·2026
Same author

Comparison of an adhesive wearing option and a headband in a non-implantable bone conduction hearing device.

Acta oto-laryngologica·2026

Bilateral cochlear implants (CI) improve sound localization and speech understanding, especially in front. Patients showed near-normal intensity differences but struggled with time differences, impacting sound perception.

Area of Science:

  • Audiology
  • Neuroscience
  • Biomedical Engineering

Background:

  • Cochlear implants (CI) aim to restore hearing in individuals with severe to profound hearing loss.
  • Bilateral CI involves implanting devices in both ears to potentially improve spatial hearing and speech comprehension.
  • Understanding the benefits and limitations of bilateral CI is crucial for optimizing patient outcomes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate sound localization and speech intelligibility in patients with bilateral cochlear implants (CI).
  • To compare the performance of bilateral CI with unilateral CI and age-matched normal hearing controls.
  • To investigate the impact of interaural intensity and time differences on auditory perception in CI users.

Main Methods:

  • Assessed minimum audible angle (MAA) for sound localization in the horizontal plane using white noise bursts.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Measured just noticeable differences (JNDs) in interaural intensity and time using various auditory stimuli.
  • Evaluated speech intelligibility in quiet and noise using the German HSM sentence test.
  • Main Results:

    • Bilateral CI users demonstrated good spatial discrimination in front and back but poor performance on the sides.
    • Near-normal interaural intensity JNDs were observed, but interaural time JNDs were significantly poorer, especially for fine structure cues.
    • Speech intelligibility was significantly better with bilateral CI compared to unilateral CI, primarily due to the head shadow effect.

    Conclusions:

    • Bilateral CI enhances spatial discrimination in front and improves speech intelligibility, particularly in noisy environments.
    • Limitations in perceiving interaural time differences, especially fine structure, may affect overall sound localization accuracy.
    • The findings support the use of bilateral CI for improved auditory rehabilitation, aligning with positive subjective patient experiences.