Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Unsupervised categorization and category learning.

Emmanuel M Pothos1, Nick Chater

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Crete, Rethymnon 74 100, Greece. pothos@psy.soc.uoc.gr

The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. A, Human Experimental Psychology
|August 18, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Agreements and disagreements with resource-rational contractualism.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same author

The Political Psychology of Economic Inequality.

Psychological science in the public interest : a journal of the American Psychological Society·2026
Same author

Random generation is what comes to mind in naturalistic settings.

Cognition·2026
Same author

Legal Decision Biases in GPT: A Comparison with Human Judgment.

Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

Divergent patterns of probabilistic reasoning in humans and GPT-5.

Frontiers in psychology·2026
Same author

Imagining and building wise machines: the centrality of AI metacognition.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026
Same journal

Relations between emotion, illusory word perception, and orthographic repetition blindness: tests of binding theory.

The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology·2005
Same journal

Causal and noncausal conditionals: an integrated model of interpretation and reasoning.

The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology·2005
Same journal

Phonological similarity effects in verbal complex span.

The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology·2005
Same journal

By which name should I call thee? The consequences of having multiple names.

The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology·2005
Same journal

Stimulus similarity decrements in children's working memory span.

The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology·2005
Same journal

Lag-1 sparing in the attentional blink: benefits and costs of integrating two events into a single episode.

The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology·2005
See all related articles

Learning to categorize items can alter intuitive perceptions, especially when a stimulus dimension is suppressed. This study explores how learned categorizations impact natural item perception and categorization.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Perception and Categorization

Background:

  • Learned categorizations can influence item perception, making them more compatible with the learned structure.
  • The extent to which learned categorizations alter intuitive (unsupervised) categorizations remains an open question.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate if learned categorizations significantly change the unsupervised categorization of items.
  • To examine the role of stimulus dimension suppression in modulating these perceptual shifts.

Main Methods:

  • Two experiments were conducted involving direct unsupervised categorization tasks and similarity ratings.
  • Pothos and Chater's (2002) model was used to infer unsupervised categorizations from similarity data.
  • Stimulus dimensions were manipulated through suppression to define learned categorizations.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Unsupervised categorization shifted towards the learned categorization when a stimulus dimension was suppressed.
  • This effect was less pronounced when the learned categorization was only partially specified by dimension suppression.
  • No significant changes in unsupervised categorization were found when learning involved fine-tuning dimension salience.

Conclusions:

  • Learned categorizations can indeed alter unsupervised item categorization, particularly under strong dimensional constraints.
  • The suppression of stimulus dimensions is a key factor in driving these perceptual changes.
  • Subtle adjustments in dimension salience during learning do not appear to affect intuitive categorization.