Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Down syndrome screening in the first and/or second trimester: model predicted performance using meta-analysis

Howard Cuckle1, Peter Benn, Dave Wright

  • 1University of Leeds, Leeds, UK. h.s.cuckle@leeds.ac.uk

Seminars in Perinatology
|August 18, 2005
PubMed
Summary

First trimester screening offers higher detection rates than second trimester screening. Sequential screening, particularly contingent screening, significantly improves detection of fetal abnormalities, making it the preferred policy.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The Variation in IRT in Different Ethnic Groups in England-Implications for a Newborn Screening Programme for CF in Diverse Multiethnic Populations.

International journal of neonatal screening·2026
Same author

Ultrasound and SNP-based cell-free DNA zygosity testing in twin pregnancies.

The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians·2026
Same author

Evaluation of safety and performance of CentaFlow™ in the assessment of fetal growth restriction - a randomized trial and prospective cohort study.

Journal of perinatal medicine·2025
Same author

Third-Trimester Screening for Preeclampsia in Twins: Comparative Performance of Fetal Medicine Foundation Algorithm, Roche, and Quidel Triages.

Fetal diagnosis and therapy·2025
Same author

Carrier screening for Alport syndrome: The clinical importance of heterozygosity for pathogenic or likely pathogenetic variants.

Journal of genetic counseling·2025
Same author

Evidence of reduced birthweight in Ukraine following the Russian invasion.

Scientific reports·2025

Area of Science:

  • Medical Screening
  • Maternal-Fetal Medicine
  • Statistical Modeling in Healthcare

Background:

  • Current prenatal screening policies vary, leading to suboptimal detection rates for fetal chromosomal abnormalities.
  • There is a need to optimize screening strategies by integrating data from multiple trimesters.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To predict and compare the screening performance of 17 different prenatal screening policies.
  • To identify the most effective screening strategy for detecting fetal chromosomal abnormalities.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized multivariate Gaussian modeling with parameters from published and new meta-analyses.
  • Incorporated gestation-specific nuchal translucency and between-trimester correlation data.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • First trimester screening demonstrated 16%–25% higher detection rates than second trimester screening at 1%–5% false-positive rates.
  • Sequential screening in both trimesters increased detection rates by 24%–35%.
  • Contingent screening emerged as the most efficient sequential policy, requiring second trimester tests for only 15% of women.

Conclusions:

  • Meta-analysis derived parameters provide a reliable framework for guiding prenatal screening policy development.
  • A contingent screening policy is favored for its high detection rate and efficiency.
  • Separate calculation of first and second trimester risks should be discontinued in favor of integrated approaches.