Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Systematic evaluation of wavefront-guided outcomes.

Guy M Kezirian1, Bruce Drum, Malvina Eydelman

  • 1SurgiVision Consultants, Inc., Scottsdale, Arizona, USA. Guy1000@SurgiVision.net

Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery
|August 18, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Diabetic retinal disease cure accelerator: Modernizing staging and endpoints.

Progress in retinal and eye research·2026
Same author

Corrigendum to "Oculomics and AI: The eye as a biomarker for health span" [Asia-Pac J Ophthalmol 15 (1) (2026) 100282].

Asia-Pacific journal of ophthalmology (Philadelphia, Pa.)·2026
Same author

Oculomics and AI: The eye as a biomarker for health span.

Asia-Pacific journal of ophthalmology (Philadelphia, Pa.)·2026
Same author

Preoperative Risk Factors of Keratometry, Myopia, Astigmatism, Age, and Sex for Myopic Regression After Laser-Assisted In Situ Keratomileusis, Photorefractive Keratectomy, and Keratorefractive Lenticule Extraction.

Cornea·2025
Same author

A Health-Related Quality of Life Measure for Patients Who Undergo Minimally Invasive Glaucoma Surgery.

American journal of ophthalmology·2024
Same author

Patient-Reported Outcomes for Minimally Invasive Glaucoma Surgery.

American journal of ophthalmology·2024
Same journal

Light adjustable lens implantation with cataract surgery in eyes with macular pathology.

Journal of cataract and refractive surgery·2026
Same journal

Comment on: Use of intracameral antibiotics prophylaxis in patients with posterior capsule rupture during cataract surgery: systemic review and meta-analysis.

Journal of cataract and refractive surgery·2026
Same journal

Dehydration and Rehydration Behavior of Ultra-High-Fluence Extracorporeal Cross-Linked Corneal Allogenic Intrastromal Ring Segments (ECO-CAIRS).

Journal of cataract and refractive surgery·2026
Same journal

Multimodal Deep Learning for Predicting Postoperative Vault and Selecting ICL Sizes Using AS-OCT and UBM Images.

Journal of cataract and refractive surgery·2026
Same journal

Reply: Evaluating large language models vs residents in cataract and refractive surgery: comparative analysis using the American Academy of Ophthalmology Self-Assessment Program.

Journal of cataract and refractive surgery·2026
Same journal

Comment on: Evaluating large language models vs residents in cataract and refractive surgery: comparative analysis using the American Academy of Ophthalmology Self-Assessment Program.

Journal of cataract and refractive surgery·2026
See all related articles

This study proposes a standardized format for reporting outcomes of aberrometer-guided refractive procedures. Standardized reporting enhances the comparison of refractive surgery results and visual function.

Area of Science:

  • Ophthalmology
  • Refractive Surgery
  • Optometry

Background:

  • Aberrometer-guided refractive procedures offer advanced visual correction.
  • Standardized outcome reporting is crucial for evaluating new technologies.
  • Current reporting methods lack uniformity, hindering comparative analysis.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To establish a consistent format for reporting outcomes of aberrometer-guided refractive procedures.
  • To facilitate qualitative and quantitative comparisons of refractive surgery results.
  • To improve the clarity and comparability of visual function data.

Main Methods:

  • Incorporate standard refractive and visual acuity outcomes (e.g., uncorrected visual acuity, manifest refractive spherical equivalent).
  • Compare postoperative uncorrected visual acuity with preoperative best spectacle-corrected visual acuity.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Report aberration data, converting second-order terms to refractions and using statistical methods for aggregate changes.

    • Main Results:

    • Aberration changes can be effectively described by comparing attempted versus achieved outcomes and analyzing stability over time.
    • Histograms of postoperative scores and ancillary plots aid in visualizing outcomes.
    • Comprehensive reports should include additional visual function data as needed.

    Conclusions:

    • Standardized tables and graphs enable robust comparison of outcomes from wavefront-guided laser refractive treatments.
    • The proposed format enhances the evaluation of refractive surgery efficacy.
    • Adaptations to reporting formats may be necessary as technology evolves.