Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 16, 2026

An Integrated Approach for Microprotein Identification and Sequence Analysis
Published on: July 12, 2022
Human SNPs reveal no evidence of frequent positive selection
1Department of Computer Science, Virginia Tech, USA. lqzhang@vt.edu
Abstract:
We compared the single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in humans in 182 housekeeping and 148 tissue-specific genes. SNPs were divided into rare and common polymorphisms based on their frequencies. We found that housekeeping genes tend to be less polymorphic than tissue-specific genes for both rare and common SNPs. Using mouse as a second species for computing sequence divergences, we found no evidence of positive selection: for both housekeeping and tissue-specific genes, the ratio of nonsynonymous to synonymous common SNPs per site showed no significant difference from that of divergence. Similarly, we observed no evidence of positive selection for the 289 and 149 genes that have orthologs available for divergence calculation between humans and chimpanzees and between humans and Old World monkeys, respectively. A comparison with previous SNP studies suggests that approximately 20% of the nonsynonymous SNPs in the human population are nearly neutral and that positive selection in the human genome might not be as frequent as previously thought.
Related Concept Videos
Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms-SNPs
Multi-species Conserved Sequences
Although the genome of each species varies greatly from each other, a few sequences are highly conserved. Such conserved DNA...
Comparing Copy Number Variations and SNPs
Copy number variations or CNVs are the structural variations that cover more than 1kb of DNA sequence. The single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), on the other hand, is a single nucleotide change or a point mutation that is found in more than 1%...
Frequency-dependent Selection
Genome-wide Association Studies-GWAS
GWAS does not require the identification of the target gene involved in...
Hardy-Weinberg Principle

