Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 16, 2026

Assessment of Child Anthropometry in a Large Epidemiologic Study
Published on: February 2, 2017
Measured versus reported parental height
F Cizmecioglu1, A Doherty, W F Paterson
1Kocaeli University, Paediatric Endocrinology & Diabetes Department, Turkey.
Background:
Parental height data are essential in the assessment of linear growth in children. A number of studies have documented inaccuracy in self-reported adult height.
Aims:
To determine whether there is a tendency for men to overestimate and women to underestimate their height.
Methods:
Heights of parents of children attending outpatient clinics were measured (MHt) and compared with reported heights (RHt).
Results:
Two hundred parents (100 males; 100 females), mean (range) age 37.8 (20.8-69.3) years, were measured. Males overestimated height, with mean (SD) RHt-MHt 1.09 (1.96) cm, while females reported height relatively accurately, with RHt-MHt -0.09 (2.37) cm.
Conclusions:
The hypothesis that males overestimate height is confirmed. While the hypothesis that women underestimate is not supported, we recommend accurate measurement of both parents, given the considerable degree of individual variation in RHt-MHt for both sexes.
Related Concept Videos
Variation: Normal Distribution, Range, and Standard Deviation
Nature and Nurture
Polygenic Traits
Regression Toward the Mean
Heritability
Applications of Normal Distribution
The heights of 15 to 18-year-old males from Chile from 1984 to 1985 followed a normal distribution. The mean height is 172.36...

