Feeding growth restricted preterm infants with abnormal antenatal Doppler results

J Dorling1, S Kempley, A Leaf

  • 1Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Robert Kilpatrick Clinical Sciences Building, PO Box 65, Leicester LE2 7LX, UK. jsd10@le.ac.uk

Insights

Infants with absent or reversed end-diastolic flow (AREDF) in umbilical arteries face feeding challenges and increased necrotising enterocolitis risk. Evidence is lacking for optimal enteral feeding timing in these high-risk newborns.

Area of Science:

  • Neonatalogy
  • Perinatology
  • Pediatric Gastroenterology

Background:

  • Absence or reversal of end-diastolic flow (AREDF) in the umbilical artery is linked to adverse perinatal outcomes.
  • Infants with AREDF often exhibit poor enteral feeding tolerance and a higher incidence of necrotising enterocolitis, particularly when complicated by fetal growth restriction.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review current practices regarding enteral feeding in infants with fetal AREDF.
  • To identify evidence gaps and inform the development of clinical guidelines for feeding these vulnerable infants.

Main Methods:

  • Systematic review of current literature and clinical practices.
  • Analysis of the incidence of necrotising enterocolitis in infants with AREDF and fetal growth restriction.
  • Examination of postnatal splanchnic blood flow dynamics and their implications for feeding.

Main Results:

  • The incidence of necrotising enterocolitis is elevated in infants with fetal AREDF, especially with co-existing fetal growth restriction.
  • Postnatal splanchnic blood flow abnormalities persist, with gradual recovery observed in the first week of life.
  • Current delayed enteral feeding policies lack supporting trial evidence and may increase reliance on parenteral nutrition.

Conclusions:

  • A delayed and cautious approach to enteral feeding is suggested by persistent postnatal splanchnic blood flow abnormalities.
  • There is a critical need for clinical trials to establish the optimal timing for initiating enteral feeds in growth-restricted infants experiencing fetal AREDF.
  • Current evidence does not support the benefits of delayed enteral nutrition, highlighting risks associated with parenteral nutrition.