Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 16, 2026

Mesocosm-Scale Constructed Wetland Design for Wastewater Treatment
Published on: May 2, 2025
Comparison of maturation ponds and constructed wetlands as the final stage of an advanced pond system
C C Tanner1, R J Craggs, J P S Sukias
1National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research, PO Box 11-115, Hamilton, New Zealand. c.tanner@niwa.co.nz
Abstract:
The treatment performance of a maturation pond (MP), the typical final polishing stage of an Advanced Pond System (APS), is compared with that of a surface-flow constructed wetland (CW) over 19 months. Both received approximately 67 mm d-1 of wastewater after passage through upstream stages of the APS. The MP, with greater sunlight exposure, had higher algal biomass (and associated suspended solids) than the CW, showed higher dissolved oxygen (DO) concentrations and greater diurnal variation in DO and pH. Neither polishing stages reduced nutrients markedly, with the CW exporting slightly more NH(3)-N and DRP, and less NO(3)-N than the MP. Disinfection was more efficient in the MP (geometric mean 1 log load removal, 12 MPN (100ml)-1) compared to the CW (0.47 log load removal, 53 MPN (100ml)-1). Incorporation of a final rock filter (28% of area) reduced median solids levels to < 10 g m(-3) in both the MP and CW. A hybrid between MPs and CWs with alternating zones of open-water (for enhanced disinfection and zooplankton grazing of algal solids) and wetland vegetation (promoting sedimentation and denitrification, and providing refugia for zooplankton) may provide more consistent effluent quality that either stage alone.
Related Concept Videos
Microbial Wastewater Treatment
Biological Treatment of Effluent and Waste Water
Net Change Theorem
Bioreactor Design and Operational System
Underflow Gates
Upstream Processing

