Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

General dental practitioners and implant suprastructures.

Geoffrey D Wood1, Farah A Ramjohn

  • 1Arrowe Park Hospital, Upton, Wirral, Merseyside, CH49 5PE.

Dental Update
|August 25, 2005
PubMed
Summary

Dental implant suprastructures made by general dental practitioners (GDPs) or specialists showed similar survival rates. This indicates successful implant restorations are achievable in general dental practice with proper guidance.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Inion biodegradable plates: the first century.

The British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery·2005
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
  • Dental Implantology
  • Prosthodontics

Background:

  • Dental implant success relies on both surgical placement and prosthetic restoration.
  • The role of general dental practitioners (GDPs) versus specialist services in fabricating implant suprastructures is an area of interest.
  • Evaluating long-term outcomes of implant-supported prostheses is crucial for clinical practice.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the survival rates of dental implant suprastructures fabricated by general dental practitioners (GDPs) versus a consultant service.
  • To assess the long-term outcomes of implant-supported restorations based on the provider of the suprastructure.
  • To determine if general dental practice can achieve successful outcomes in implant superstructure fabrication.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective review of patients who received dental implants from a single oral and maxillofacial surgeon.
  • Comparison of implant suprastructures made by GDPs and a consultant service.
  • Analysis of implant survival data over a 12-year period (1991-2003).

Main Results:

  • A total of 88 patients with 224 implants were initially identified.
  • 28 patients with 83 implants participated in the examination.
  • Implants with suprastructures fabricated by both GDPs and the consultant service demonstrated equal survival rates.

Conclusions:

  • Successful placement and restoration of dental implant suprastructures are feasible within general dental practice.
  • Appropriate mentoring and support are key factors for achieving successful outcomes in general dental practice.
  • This study supports the integration of GDPs in the prosthetic phase of dental implant treatment.

Related Experiment Videos