Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Does chemically induced hepatocyte proliferation predict liver carcinogenesis?

R L Melnick1

  • 1National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709.

FASEB Journal : Official Publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology
|June 1, 1992
PubMed
Summary

Chemically induced cell proliferation does not appear to be the main driver of liver cancer. Studies show a lack of sustained proliferative response and no clear link between cell division and tumor development.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Structure-activity relationships for perfluoroalkane-induced in vitro interference with rat liver mitochondrial respiration.

Toxicology letters·2013
Same author

Detection and expression of enterotoxin genes in endophytic strains of Bacillus cereus.

Letters in applied microbiology·2012
Same author

Studies of nephrotoxic agents in an improved renal proximal tubule system.

Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA·2010
Same author

Biochemical origins of the non-monotonic receptor-mediated dose-response.

Journal of molecular endocrinology·2002
Same author

A physiologically based pharmacokinetic model for inhalation and intravenous administration of naphthalene in rats and mice.

Toxicology and applied pharmacology·2001
Same author

Is peroxisome proliferation an obligatory precursor step in the carcinogenicity of di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (DEHP)?

Environmental health perspectives·2001

Area of Science:

  • Toxicology
  • Carcinogenesis
  • Cell Biology

Background:

  • Cell proliferation is a known factor in chemically induced carcinogenesis.
  • A hypothesis suggests that enhanced cell division by nongenotoxic carcinogens increases spontaneous mutations, leading to cancer.
  • It was proposed that non-DNA-reactive compounds without proliferative effects pose no cancer risk.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the literature on the relationship between chemically induced cell proliferation and liver carcinogenesis.
  • To determine if chemically induced cell proliferation is the primary mechanism of liver cancer caused by nongenotoxic chemicals.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of studies on cell proliferation and liver carcinogenesis.
  • Analysis of studies with extended exposure periods and relevant exposure concentrations.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Evaluation of quantitative correspondences between cellular proliferation and carcinogenic responses.

    • Main Results:

    • Few systematic cell proliferation studies exist for extended exposure periods.
    • Exposure concentrations in many studies were not comparable to those in cancer studies.
    • The proliferative response to many nongenotoxic carcinogens is not sustained, unlike the prolonged exposure often required for carcinogenic effects.

    Conclusions:

    • Quantitative links between cell proliferation and carcinogenesis are not demonstrated.
    • The hypothesis that chemically induced cell proliferation is the primary mechanism for nongenotoxic chemical liver cancer is not supported.
    • Understanding chemical effects on both cell loss and replication is crucial; cell proliferation measurements alone are insufficient to explain tumor development mechanisms.