Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 16, 2026

Comparative Analysis of Automatic Fecal Analyzer versus Direct Wet Smear Microscopy for Detecting Parasitic Infections in Stool Samples
Published on: April 25, 2025
Significantly increased recovery of intestinal parasites on routine stool specimen evaluation
Boonchai Wongstitwilairoong1, Apichai Srijan, Songmuang Piyaphong
1Department of Enteric Diseases, Armed Forces Research Institute of Medical Sciences (AFRIMS), US Army Medical Component, Phyathai, Bangkok, Thailand. boonchaiw@afrims.org
Abstract:
Three hundred thirty-six stool samples from October 2001 through October 2002 were analyzed for the presence of intestinal parasites. Fifty-six of these (16.7%) were positive for a total of 66 parasites; 65/66 (98.5%) were detected by iodine and dimethyl sulfoxide-modified acid-fast (DMSO-mAFB) stained smears of fresh and formalin-ethylacetate sedimentation concentrated samples. Saline, iodine, and DMSO-mAFB stained smears of fresh stool samples alone detected significantly fewer parasites, finding only 50/66 (75.8%) (p < 0.05). Stool samples analyzed by trichrome stained specimens preserved in Zinc sulfate polyvinyl alcohol (Zinc PVA) detected only 41/ 66 (62.2%) of the parasites. In our study population, it was necessary to perform the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standard (NCCLS) recommended to accurately detect intestinal parasites. The concentration technique is simple and significantly increased the detection of intestinal parasites.
Related Concept Videos
Giardiasis
Serum Laboratory Studies, Stool Test, Breath Test

