Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Sources of variation in Affymetrix microarray experiments.

Stanislav O Zakharkin1, Kyoungmi Kim, Tapan Mehta

  • 1University of Alabama, Birmingham, Alabama, USA. szakharkin@ms.soph.uab.edu

BMC Bioinformatics
|August 30, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Eating versus skipping breakfast has no discernible effect on obesity-related anthropometric outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

F1000Research·2023
Same author

Aging: What We Can Learn From Elephants.

Frontiers in aging·2022
Same author

Risk of Type 2 Diabetes Among Individuals with Excess Weight: Weight Trajectory Effects.

Current diabetes reports·2022
Same author

Errors and incorrect conclusions need correction in "The low-carbohydrate-diet score is associated with resting metabolic rate: an epidemiologic study among Iranian adults".

Journal of diabetes and metabolic disorders·2022
Same author

Estimation of sparse functional quantile regression with measurement error: a SIMEX approach.

Biostatistics (Oxford, England)·2022
Same author

Taking a Hard Look at the Empirical Evidence for Popular Community-Based Interventions in Obesity.

JAMA pediatrics·2022
Same journal

OpenIMC: an open-source platform for analyzing single-cell and spatial proteomics by imaging mass cytometry.

BMC bioinformatics·2026
Same journal

NAP: an open source pipeline for cross-domain microbiome profiling using Nanopore sequencing-derived amplicon data.

BMC bioinformatics·2026
Same journal

SurvGME: an R package for survival analysis with graphical and measurement error models.

BMC bioinformatics·2026
Same journal

SimMapNet: a Bayesian framework for gene regulatory network inference using gene ontology similarities as external hint.

BMC bioinformatics·2026
Same journal

Dual channel drug-drug interactions extraction based on cross attention.

BMC bioinformatics·2026
Same journal

FeSseqdb: a curated sequence-level database and interpretable machine learning framework for identifying iron-sulfur proteins.

BMC bioinformatics·2026
See all related articles

Biological variation is the largest source of variability in microarray experiments, exceeding technical factors like labeling. Technical replicates show higher agreement than biological ones, crucial for experimental design.

Area of Science:

  • Genomics and Bioinformatics
  • Molecular Biology
  • Toxicology and Pharmacology

Background:

  • Microarray experiments are subject to numerous biological and technical sources of variation.
  • Understanding and quantifying these variations are critical for robust experimental design and data interpretation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To quantify the relative magnitudes of different sources of variation in a microarray experiment.
  • To assess the agreement between biological and technical replicates in gene expression analysis.

Main Methods:

  • Conducted a microarray experiment using 24 Affymetrix GeneChip arrays with rat mammary gland samples.
  • Split RNA samples from each rat to differentiate labeling and hybridization variation.
  • Employed a general linear model for variance component estimation and Pearson correlations for replicate agreement.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Biological variation was identified as the primary source of variability, followed by residual error and labeling variation when using dChip and RMA algorithms.
  • With MAS 5.0 or GCRMA-EB processing, residual error became the dominant source, followed by biological and labeling variation.
  • Pearson correlations demonstrated consistently higher agreement between technical replicates compared to biological replicates.

Conclusions:

  • Biological variation significantly influences microarray data, with its magnitude relative to technical variation dependent on image processing algorithms.
  • Technical replicates offer higher reproducibility than biological replicates, a key consideration for experimental planning.
  • The choice of image processing software impacts the assessment of variation sources in gene expression studies.