Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

User charges and priority setting in health care: balancing equity and efficiency.

Peter C Smith1

  • 1Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York YO10 5DD, UK. pcs1@york.ac.uk

Journal of Health Economics
|September 1, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Mediators and moderators of successful population-level weight management in primary care: results from the PATHWEIGH cluster-randomized pragmatic trial.

International journal of obesity (2005)·2026
Same author

Implementation and effectiveness of a care process to prioritize weight management in primary care: a stepped-wedge cluster-randomized trial.

Nature medicine·2025
Same author

Primary care patient and practice member perspectives on weight loss medications: challenges and opportunities.

Frontiers in medicine·2025
Same author

Environmental Enrichment Attenuates Reproductive Adversity in a Mouse Model of Parkinson Disease.

Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS·2025
Same author

Do health care quality improvement policies work for all? Distributional effects by baseline quality in South Africa.

Health economics·2024
Same author

Prior Influenza Infection Mitigates SARS-CoV-2 Disease in Syrian Hamsters.

Viruses·2024
Same journal

Competition matters: Uniform vs. indication-based pricing of pharmaceuticals.

Journal of health economics·2026
Same journal

Integrating equity and productivity in health evaluation.

Journal of health economics·2026
Same journal

Income and immunity: The consequences of social security administration reform for childhood infection risk.

Journal of health economics·2026
Same journal

When fewer children mean shorter lives: Fertility policy and elderly well-being in China.

Journal of health economics·2026
Same journal

Health dynamics and reporting bias at retirement: An analysis using high-frequency data.

Journal of health economics·2026
Same journal

Intertemporal coordination in volunteer markets.

Journal of health economics·2026
See all related articles

This study introduces a model for health care priority setting that incorporates user charges alongside fixed budgets. Optimal subsidy levels for health technologies depend on cost-effectiveness, demand elasticity, disease factors, and equity considerations.

Area of Science:

  • Health Economics
  • Health Policy
  • Public Health

Background:

  • User charges are a significant funding source for healthcare systems.
  • Traditional priority-setting methods like cost-effectiveness analysis often overlook user charges, impacting equity and efficiency.
  • Integrating user charges into priority setting is crucial for comprehensive healthcare finance models.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a model for health care priority setting that accounts for user charges and a fixed budget.
  • To establish rules for including health technologies in subsidized packages and determining copayment rates.
  • To analyze the factors influencing optimal subsidy levels in healthcare.

Main Methods:

  • Development of a rudimentary model for priority setting incorporating user charges.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Application of methods analogous to optimal commodity taxation.
  • Derivation of rules for health technology inclusion and copayment calculation.

    • Main Results:

    • Optimal subsidy levels are influenced by cost-effectiveness, price elasticity of demand, disease epidemiology, and equity concerns.
    • The model provides a framework for calculating appropriate copayment rates.
    • Findings highlight the interplay between financial mechanisms and health policy objectives.

    Conclusions:

    • The developed model offers a novel approach to health care priority setting by integrating user charges.
    • Policy decisions on health technology adoption and financing require consideration of economic and equity factors.
    • The research has implications for health care priority setting, technology evaluation, and charging policies.