Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 8, 2026

Stabilizing Hepatocellular Phenotype Using Optimized Synthetic Surfaces
Published on: September 26, 2014
Variations between Biomer lots. I. Significant differences in the surface chemistry of two lots of a commercial
B J Tyler1, B D Ratner, D G Castner
1Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle 98195.
Abstract:
We have studied the surface chemistry of two lots of Biomer (BSP067 and BSUA001), a widely used commercial poly(ether urethane) (PEU). Although transmission infrared adsorption studies revealed no differences in the bulk chemistry of the two lots, the surface chemistry, as seen by x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and static secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS), was different. Lot BSP067 showed soft-segment enrichment at the surface, which is typical of PEU. Lot BSUA001 showed no evidence of either hard- or soft-segment PEU components at the surface. The surface of this lot was completely covered with a nonextractable additive identified as poly(diisopropyl amino ethyl methacrylate). Small amounts of a low-molecular-weight antioxidant were observed at the surface of both samples. Because the biological response to polymers is dependent on surface structure, these results are of considerable importance to biomaterials research.
Related Concept Videos
Characteristics and Nomenclature of Copolymers
Polymer Classification: Architecture
Polymer Classification: Stereospecificity
Classification and Mechanical Properties of Synthetic Polymers
Determination of Molar Masses of Polymers I
Pharmaceutical Alternatives: Polymorphic Form-Related and Particle Size-Related Therapeutic Nonequivalence

