Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 16, 2026
Innovative Strategies for Organ Preservation in Heart Transplantation: Uniform Cooling Preservation and Ex-situ Normothermic Perfusion
Published on: November 28, 2025
The Geat Britain and Ireland perspective: current perfusion safety issues, preparing for the future
1Department of Clinical Perfusion Science, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK. john@londonperfusionscience.com
Insights
New safety standards for cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) in Great Britain and Ireland (GBI) are essential. This includes patient safety, perfusionist well-being, and career protection, alongside careful implementation of new CPB techniques.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Surgery
- Perfusion Technology
- Patient Safety Standards
Background:
- The Great Britain and Ireland (GBI) recommendations for cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) standards were implemented in January 2004.
- While a baseline safety level exists, department-specific safety considerations are crucial.
- Patient safety, perfusionist health, and career protection are interrelated aspects of safety in the specialty.
Purpose of the Study:
- To emphasize the importance of rigorous assessment, implementation, and documentation when introducing new components or techniques to the CPB circuit.
- To highlight the significance of understanding the civil justice system and medical negligence trends for perfusionist safety.
- To discuss the implications of the rising professional recognition of perfusion in GBI and its potential impact on medical negligence claims.
Main Methods:
- Review of GBI recommendations for CPB monitoring and alarms.
- Analysis of safety considerations in introducing new CPB circuit components and techniques.
- Discussion of legal and professional recognition trends impacting perfusionists.
Main Results:
- The 2004 GBI recommendations provide a baseline for CPB safety.
- Careful introduction of new CPB elements is vital for maintaining and enhancing safety.
- Increased professional recognition of perfusion may lead to more specific medical negligence claims.
Conclusions:
- A holistic approach to safety in CPB is necessary, encompassing patients, perfusionists, and professional standards.
- Thorough evaluation and documentation are critical for safe innovation in CPB.
- Perfusionists must be aware of legal and professional landscapes to ensure safety and career protection.
Abstract:
The Great Britain and Ireland (GBI) recommendations for standards of monitoring and alarms during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) came into force in January 2004. While perfusion departments in Great Britain and Ireland should now have a good baseline level of safety, it is important that department-specific safety is also considered. Patient safety is paramount, but safety within our speciality must also take into account the protection of the perfusionists' health and the protection of their careers. These different aspects of safety are fundamentally interrelated. This paper focuses on the importance of careful assessment, implementation and documentation when a new component or technique is being introduced to the CPB circuit, even when the aim is to increase safety. Knowledge of the civil justice system and the trends in medical negligence claims are an integral part of perfusionist safety. Perfusion in Great Britain and Ireland is rightly striving for professional recognition from the Health Professions Council (HPC). As we raise the profile of perfusion, we educate more people about the importance of our role and level of responsibility within the cardiac operating team. This will increase the potential for medical negligence claims to be directed specifically at our speciality. All these issues are discussed in detail.
