Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Implant ethics.

S O Hansson1

  • 1Philosophy Unit, Royal Institute of Technology, Teknikringen 78, 100 44 Stockholm, Sweden. soh@infra.kth.se

Journal of Medical Ethics
|September 1, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Reply to the comment from C Fiori and D Martinez on my article 'homoeopathy and consumers' right to know'.

Journal of internal medicine·2013
Same author

Homoeopathy and consumers' right to know.

Journal of internal medicine·2013
Same author

Bodily rights and property rights.

Journal of medical ethics·2006
Same author

Epistemic paternalism in public health.

Journal of medical ethics·2005
Same author

Extended antipaternalism.

Journal of medical ethics·2005
Same author

Disease recording systems and herd health schemes for production diseases.

Acta veterinaria Scandinavica. Supplementum·2002
Same journal

Assisted dying and autonomy as an end in itself: a response to Donaldson.

Journal of medical ethics·2026
Same journal

Ethics briefing.

Journal of medical ethics·2026
Same journal

Medical ethics and categorisation.

Journal of medical ethics·2026
Same journal

Suspension or prioritisation? Exploring the ethics of age-based rationing in adult ADHD services.

Journal of medical ethics·2026
Same journal

Ethics of not knowing who we are talking to in qualitative research.

Journal of medical ethics·2026
Same journal

Suicide is not a public health issue and perhaps very few things should be.

Journal of medical ethics·2026
See all related articles

Implant ethics examines the moral issues of long-term technological devices in the body. This study proposes a systematic approach to analyze challenges like end-of-life decisions and human enhancement.

Area of Science:

  • Bioethics
  • Medical Technology Ethics
  • Philosophy of Technology

Background:

  • Technological implants offer solutions but introduce new ethical dilemmas.
  • Existing ethical frameworks may not fully address the complexities of human implants.
  • The lasting nature of implants necessitates a distinct ethical analysis.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To define implant ethics as a field of study.
  • To systematically identify and analyze the major ethical challenges posed by technological implants.
  • To propose a framework for addressing these challenges.

Main Methods:

  • Conceptual analysis of ethical issues related to human implants.
  • Identification of key problem areas through literature review and ethical reasoning.
Keywords:
Analytical ApproachHealth Care and Public Health

Related Experiment Videos

  • Development of a systematic approach to implant ethics.

    • Main Results:

    • Implant ethics is defined as the study of ethical aspects of lasting technological devices in the human body.
    • Key ethical issues identified include end-of-life decisions, human enhancement, mental changes, personal identity, and cultural impacts.
    • A systematic approach to analyzing these issues is proposed.

    Conclusions:

    • Technological implants present unique ethical challenges distinct from transplantation.
    • A structured ethical framework is necessary to navigate issues of human enhancement and personal identity.
    • Further analysis is required to address the cultural and societal implications of widespread human implantation.