Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 18, 2026

Characterization of the Sense of Agency over the Actions of Neural-machine Interface-operated Prostheses
Published on: January 7, 2019
The role of moral disengagement in the execution process
Michael J Osofsky1, Albert Bandura, Philip G Zimbardo
1Department of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305-2130, USA. bandura@psych.stanford.edu
Abstract:
The present study tested the proposition that disengagement of moral self-sanctions enables prison personnel to carry out the death penalty. Three subgroups of personnel in penitentiaries located in three Southern states were assessed in terms of eight mechanisms of moral disengagement. The personnel included the execution teams that carry out the executions; the support teams that provide solace and emotional support to the families of the victims and the condemned inmate; and prison guards who have no involvement in the execution process. The executioners exhibited the highest level of moral, social, and economic justifications, disavowal of personal responsibility, and dehumanization. The support teams that provide the more humane services disavowed moral disengagement, as did the noninvolved guards but to a lesser degree than the support teams.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Obedience
Milgram's Obedience to Authority
Cognitive Dissonance
Deindividuation
Kohlberg's Theory of Moral Development
Pre-Conventional Level
At the pre-conventional level, morality is primarily driven by personal consequences. In Stage...
Impression Management Techniques III: Aligning Actions

