Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Auditory frequency discrimination learning is affected by stimulus variability.

Sygal Amitay1, David J C Hawkey, David R Moore

  • 1MRC Institute of Hearing Research, Nottingham, England. s.amitay@ich.ucl.ac.uk

Perception & Psychophysics
|September 2, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Medical risk factors associated with listening difficulties in children.

International journal of audiology·2026
Same author

Speech-in-noise difficulties in aminoglycoside ototoxicity reflects combined afferent and efferent dysfunction.

Hearing research·2026
Same author

Spatial release from masking predicts listening difficulty in children.

International journal of audiology·2026
Same author

Machine learning-enhanced behavioural approach to detecting reactions to sound in infants and toddlers: proof-of-concept study.

International journal of audiology·2026
Same author

High-Pass and Low-Pass Filtered Digits-in-Noise Tests for Estimating Frequency-Specific Hearing Loss.

Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR·2026
Same author

Reduced neural speech tracking in adolescents with listening difficulty.

Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology·2026
Same journal

Response organization in selective adaptation to speech sounds.

Perception & psychophysics·2014
Same journal

Reaction times to comparisons within and across phonetic categories.

Perception & psychophysics·2012
Same journal

Auditory and phonetic memory codes in the discrimination of consonants and vowels.

Perception & psychophysics·2012
Same journal

Simple and contingent adaptation effects for place of articulation in stop consonants.

Perception & psychophysics·2012
Same journal

Auditory property detectors and processing place features in stop consonants.

Perception & psychophysics·2012
Same journal

Visual working memory for line orientations and face identities.

Perception & psychophysics·2008
See all related articles

Training set variability impacts pure-tone frequency discrimination (FD) learning differently for good and poor listeners. Variability can slow learning and impair generalization, depending on individual hearing ability.

Area of Science:

  • Auditory Perception
  • Psychoacoustics
  • Human Hearing

Background:

  • Frequency discrimination (FD) is crucial for understanding speech and music.
  • Training set variability may influence auditory learning and generalization.
  • Individual differences in hearing ability can affect auditory training outcomes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how training set variability affects pure-tone frequency discrimination learning and generalization.
  • To compare the effects of fixed, slightly varying, and widely varying standard tones during training.
  • To examine how individual differences in initial FD thresholds interact with training conditions.

Main Methods:

  • Three groups of normally hearing adults trained on frequency discrimination with different standard tone variabilities.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Listeners were categorized as 'good' or 'poor' based on initial FD thresholds.
  • Transfer of learning was assessed to untrained frequencies and conditions.

    • Main Results:

    • For good listeners, slight training variability slowed learning, but wide variability did not.
    • Poor listeners showed slowed learning and impaired generalization with any training variability.
    • Transfer to untrained frequencies was generally good, but Group 1 (fixed training) showed poor transfer to roving conditions.

    Conclusions:

    • The impact of training set variability on auditory learning and generalization is dependent on both the degree of variability and the listener's initial FD ability.
    • Tailoring training set variability to individual hearing capabilities may optimize auditory training outcomes.
    • Understanding these interactions is key for developing effective auditory training paradigms.