Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Combining multiple comparisons and modeling techniques in dose-response studies.

F Bretz1, J C Pinheiro, M Branson

  • 1Novartis Pharma AG, Lichtstrasse 35, Basel, Switzerland. frank.bretz@novartis.com

Biometrics
|September 2, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Gender differences in PTSD severity and pain outcomes: baseline results from the LAMP trial.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2023
Same author

Chemometric methods in antimalarial drug design from 1,2,4,5-tetraoxanes analogues.

SAR and QSAR in environmental research·2020
Same author

Optimal designs for active controlled dose-finding trials with efficacy-toxicity outcomes.

Biometrika·2018
Same author

Matrix metalloproteinase-8 levels in periodontal disease patients: A systematic review.

Journal of periodontal research·2017
Same author

Advanced Methods for Dose and Regimen Finding During Drug Development: Summary of the EMA/EFPIA Workshop on Dose Finding (London 4-5 December 2014).

CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology·2017
Same author

"Threshold-crossing": A Useful Way to Establish the Counterfactual in Clinical Trials?

Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics·2016
Same journal

Fast penalized generalized estimating equations for large longitudinal functional datasets.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Causally-interpretable random-effects meta-analysis.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Statistical inference for mean function of partially observed functional time series.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Subgroup identification via Interaction Tree and Mixed Model for Repeated Measures with application to Alzheimer's disease.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Finite mixtures of linear quantile regressions with concomitant variables: a solution to endogeneity in longitudinal data modeling.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Discussion on "INTACT: a method for integration of longitudinal physical activity data from multiple sources" by Jingru Zhang, Erjia Cui, Hongzhe Li, and Haochang Shou.

Biometrics·2026
See all related articles

This study introduces a unified strategy for dose-response analysis, combining multiple comparison and modeling techniques. This approach enhances the identification of optimal doses by selecting the most appropriate dose-response model while controlling statistical error rates.

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Pharmacometrics
  • Toxicology

Background:

  • Dose-response analysis traditionally uses either model-based or multiple comparison procedures.
  • Model-based methods rely on pre-specified parametric models, risking incorrect conclusions if the model is misspecified.
  • Multiple comparison procedures treat dose as qualitative, focusing on identifying effective doses with minimal assumptions but limited inference.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a unified strategy for dose-response data analysis.
  • To integrate multiple comparison techniques with model-based approaches.
  • To improve the selection of dose-response models and subsequent dose inference.

Main Methods:

  • A unified strategy combining multiple comparison and modeling techniques was developed.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Multiple comparison procedures were used to select the most likely parametric dose-response model from a set of candidates.
  • Family-wise error rate was preserved throughout the model selection and inference process.

    • Main Results:

    • The proposed unified strategy effectively selects the most appropriate dose-response model.
    • The method allows for robust inference on adequate doses while controlling the family-wise error rate.
    • This approach offers a more reliable way to analyze dose-response data compared to traditional methods.

    Conclusions:

    • The unified strategy provides a robust framework for dose-response analysis.
    • It enhances the reliability of selecting dose-response models and estimating effective doses.
    • This integrated approach optimizes the analysis of quantitative biological responses to varying doses.