Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Standardizing diagnostic markers to evaluate and compare their performance.

Margaret Sullivan Pepe1, Gary Longton

  • 1Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. mspepe@u.washington.edu

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)
|September 2, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Internal Standard Triggered-Parallel Reaction Monitoring Mass Spectrometry Enables Multiplexed Quantification of Candidate Biomarkers in Plasma.

Analytical chemistry·2022
Same author

Plasma miRNA Biomarkers in Limited Volume Samples for Detection of Early-stage Pancreatic Cancer.

Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.)·2021
Same author

Use of the MyProstateScore Test to Rule Out Clinically Significant Cancer: Validation of a Straightforward Clinical Testing Approach.

The Journal of urology·2020
Same author

Second opinion strategies in breast pathology: a decision analysis addressing over-treatment, under-treatment, and care costs.

Breast cancer research and treatment·2017
Same author

Association Between Benign Breast Disease in African American and White American Women and Subsequent Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

JAMA oncology·2016
Same author

Achieving consensus for the histopathologic diagnosis of melanocytic lesions: use of the modified Delphi method.

Journal of cutaneous pathology·2016

A new standardization method rigorously evaluates diagnostic markers by comparing their distributions in affected versus unaffected subjects. This approach offers a clearer, more accessible way to compare marker accuracy and interpret receiver operating characteristic curves.

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Medical Diagnostics
  • Biomarker Research

Background:

  • Rigorous evaluation of classification accuracy is crucial for diagnostic markers.
  • A standardized statistical approach for marker evaluation and comparison is currently lacking.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce a novel standardization method for evaluating and comparing diagnostic markers.
  • To provide an intuitive statistical tool for biomarker research.

Main Methods:

  • Standardization uses the distribution of marker values in unaffected subjects as a reference.
  • Calculates a standardized placement value for affected subjects based on unaffected subject data.
  • Connects standardized marker value distributions to receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Applied to pancreatic cancer markers (CA-19-9 vs. CA-125), CA-19-9 showed better performance.
  • Demonstrated improved hearing impairment detection with lower sound stimulus intensity.
  • Established explicit links between standardized values and ROC curves.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed standardization is an intuitive and effective method for evaluating markers.
  • Facilitates direct, meaningful comparisons between different diagnostic markers.
  • Enhances understanding of ROC analysis and addresses typically unaddressed research questions like covariate effects.