Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 9, 2026

Murine Prostate Micro-dissection and Surgical Castration
Published on: May 11, 2016
Antiandrogens prevent stable DNA-binding of the androgen receptor
Pascal Farla1, Remko Hersmus, Jan Trapman
1Department of Pathology, Josephine Nefkens Institute, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, PO Box 1738, 3000 DR Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Abstract:
The androgen receptor (AR) is essential for development of the male gender and in the growth of the majority of prostate cancers. Agonists as well as most antagonists induce translocation of the receptor to the nucleus, whereas only agonists can activate AR function. Antagonists are therefore used in the therapy of metastasized prostate cancer. To obtain insight into the mechanism by which antagonists block AR function in living cells, we studied nuclear mobility and localization of green fluorescent protein (GFP)-tagged AR in the presence of either the agonist R1881 or the antagonists bicalutamide and hydroxyflutamide. As controls we investigated a non-DNA-binding AR mutant (A573D) and two mutants (W741C and T877A) with broadened ligand specificity. We demonstrate that in the presence of R1881, AR localizes in numerous intranuclear foci and, using complementary fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) approaches and computer modelling, that a fraction of AR ( approximately 10-15%) is transiently immobilized in a DNA-binding-dependent manner (individual ARs being immobile for approximately 45 seconds). By contrast, antagonist-bound GFP-AR showed no detectable immobile fraction and the mobility was similar to that of the R1881-liganded non-DNA-binding mutant (A573D), indicating that antagonists do not induce the relatively stable DNA-binding-dependent immobilization observed with agonist-bound AR. Moreover, in the presence of bicalutamide and hydroxyflutamide GFP-AR was homogeneously distributed in the nucleus. Binding of bicalutamide and hydroxyflutamide to GFP-AR(W741C) and GFP-AR(T877A), respectively, resulted in similar mobility and heterogeneous nuclear distribution as observed for R1881-liganded GFP-AR. The live cell studies indicate that the investigated antagonists interfere with events early in the transactivation function of the AR.
Insights
Androgen receptor (AR) antagonists used in prostate cancer therapy do not immobilize the receptor in the nucleus like agonists do. This suggests antagonists interfere with early AR activation steps, offering new therapeutic insights.
Area of Science:
- Molecular Biology
- Cell Biology
- Biochemistry
Background:
- The androgen receptor (AR) is crucial for male development and prostate cancer growth.
- AR agonists activate receptor function, while antagonists are used to treat metastatic prostate cancer.
- Understanding how antagonists block AR function in living cells is key to improving therapies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the mechanism by which AR antagonists block AR function.
- To compare the nuclear mobility and localization of GFP-tagged AR in the presence of agonists and antagonists.
- To elucidate the role of DNA-binding in AR immobilization and activation.
Main Methods:
- Live-cell imaging of green fluorescent protein (GFP)-tagged androgen receptor (AR).
- Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) to measure AR mobility.
- Computer modeling to analyze AR dynamics.
- Utilized AR mutants with altered DNA-binding and ligand specificity.
Main Results:
- Agonist-bound AR exhibits transient, DNA-binding-dependent immobilization within intranuclear foci.
- Antagonist-bound AR (bicalutamide, hydroxyflutamide) shows no significant immobilization and homogeneous nuclear distribution.
- AR mutants with broadened ligand specificity behaved similarly to agonist-bound wild-type AR when bound to antagonists.
- Antagonists do not induce the stable DNA-binding-dependent immobilization seen with agonists.
Conclusions:
- Investigated antagonists interfere with early steps of AR transactivation, distinct from agonist-induced immobilization.
- The differential nuclear dynamics of AR upon agonist versus antagonist binding provide mechanistic insight into AR inhibition.
- Findings suggest novel therapeutic strategies targeting AR early activation events.
Related Concept Videos
DNA Damage can Stall the Cell Cycle
Eukaryotic Transcription Inhibitors
Eukaryotic transcription inhibitors usually contain two distinct domains, a DNA...
DNA Damage Can Stall the Cell Cycle
Drug-Receptor Interaction: Antagonist
Antagonists can be classified as competitive or noncompetitive based on their...
Adrenergic Antagonists: Chemistry and Classification of ɑ-Receptor Blockers
Nonselective α-blockers: Nonselective α-blockers contain haloalkylamine or imidazoline moieties. Phenoxybenzamine, with a haloalkylamine...
Adrenergic Antagonists: Pharmacological Actions of ɑ-Receptor Blockers
α1-blockers: These drugs inhibit α1-adrenoceptors on smooth muscle cells, resulting in vasodilation. This vasodilation lowers blood pressure, making α1-blockers valuable in treating hypertension. Additionally, α1-blockers effectively address urinary obstruction...

