Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 16, 2026

Workflow and Framework for Collecting and Implementing Point-of-Care Ultrasound Data in the Management of Heart Failure Patients
Published on: July 12, 2024
Clinical practice guideline adherence before and after implementation of the HEARTFELT (HEART Failure Effectiveness &
Patricia C Dykes1, Kim Acevedo, Jodie Boldrighini
1Partners HealthCare System, Boston, MA, USA. pdykes@partners.org
Insights
The HEART Failure Effectiveness & Leadership Team (HEARTFELT) intervention improved clinician adherence with electronic health record documentation and patient self-management education for heart failure (HF). Medical intervention adherence showed no significant change.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Healthcare Management
- Clinical Practice Guidelines
Background:
- Adherence to American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association practice guidelines for heart failure (HF) is crucial for optimal patient outcomes.
- Integrating evidence-based practices into community hospital settings remains a challenge.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the impact of the HEART Failure Effectiveness & Leadership Team (HEARTFELT) intervention on clinician adherence to HF practice guidelines.
- To assess changes in adherence before and after HEARTFELT implementation.
Main Methods:
- A quasi-experimental, pretest/posttest design with an untreated control group was used.
- The intervention included electronic medical record pathways, evidence access, self-management tools, and feedback.
- Data were analyzed using parametric and nonparametric statistical methods.
Main Results:
- HEARTFELT significantly improved clinician adherence with electronic health record documentation of self-management categories (P = .000).
- Adherence with providing written self-management education to patients at discharge significantly increased (P = .000).
- No significant differences were observed in adherence to medical interventions (P = .39).
Conclusions:
- The multifaceted HEARTFELT intervention shows promise for integrating evidence into clinical practice at the point of care.
- It has the potential to reduce practice variation and improve outcomes for heart failure patients.
- Further exploration of integration methods in community hospitals is warranted.
Abstract:
HEART Failure Effectiveness & Leadership Team (HEARTFELT) is a multifaceted intervention designed to improve adherence with the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association practice guidelines for heart failure (HF). The purpose of this study was to assess differences in clinician adherence with clinical practice guidelines before and after implementation of HEARTFELT. A quasi-experimental, untreated control group design with separate pretest/posttest samples was employed at a community hospital in Connecticut. The untreated historical control group included patients aged 65 years or older with HF and a nonequivalent comparison group of patients with stroke. The posttest samples included patients with the diagnosis of HF and stroke admitted after implementation of the HEARTFELT intervention. The HEARTFELT intervention included automated pathway in electronic medical record (order sets, interdisciplinary plan of care, self-management plan), access to evidence for clinicians and patients, HF self-management education tools, and ongoing discipline-specific feedback regarding adherence. Data were analyzed using parametric and nonparametric methods. The HEARTFELT intervention significantly improved clinician adherence with addressing all self-management categories in the electronic medical record (P = .000) and adherence with self-management education given to the patient in writing at discharge (P = .000). There were no significant differences in adherence with medical interventions (P = .39). While guideline adherence is associated with less practice variation and improved processes, methods of integration into practice in community hospital settings have been largely unexplored. The multifaceted HEARTFELT intervention is promising for its potential to integrate evidence at the point of care, to reduce unwarranted variation in practice, and ultimately to improve the outcomes of individuals with HF.
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure VII: Nursing Interventions
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Heart Failure V: Medical Management
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Heart Failure IV: Classification and Diagnostic Evaluation
Heart Failure I: Introduction