Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 16, 2026

11:19
Measuring Carbon-based Contaminant Mineralization Using Combined CO2 Flux and Radiocarbon Analyses
Published on: October 21, 2016
Revisiting a classification scheme for U.S.-Mexico alluvial basin-fill aquifers
Barry J Hibbs1, Bruce K Darling
1bhibbs@calstatela.edu
Ground Water
|September 10, 2005
Summary
Understanding groundwater flow in Trans-Pecos basins is crucial for waste disposal. This study classifies four aquifers, revealing diverse drainage patterns essential for contaminant transport assessment.
Area of Science:
- Hydrogeology
- Environmental Science
- Geology
Background:
- Intermontane basins in Texas and Mexico are potential sites for municipal sludge and low-level radioactive waste disposal.
- Assessing contaminant fate and movement necessitates understanding groundwater dynamics within and between these basins.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate and classify four associated basin aquifers: Red Light Draw, Northwest Eagle Flat, Southeast Eagle Flat, and El Cuervo.
- To determine groundwater movement and discharge patterns for risk assessment.
Main Methods:
- Hydrogeological classification of basin aquifers based on topography and drainage.
- Analysis of surface and groundwater discharge mechanisms.
- Assessment of interbasin groundwater flow and cross-formational flow.
Main Results:
- Red Light Draw Aquifer: Topographically open, through-flowing basin with the Rio Grande as the discharge outlet.
- Northwest Eagle Flat Aquifer: Topographically closed and drained, with discharge via interbasin groundwater flow, likely to underlying Permian rocks.
- Southeast Eagle Flat Aquifer: Topographically open and drained, discharging to Wildhorse Flat.
- El Cuervo Aquifer: Topographically closed basin, potentially partially drained to Indian Hot Springs or undrained, discharging to Laguna El Cuervo.
Conclusions:
- Groundwater flow systems in these basins exhibit significant variability, influencing contaminant transport.
- Classification of aquifers as open or closed is critical for predicting groundwater behavior and potential risks.
- Further investigation into interbasin flow is essential for comprehensive waste disposal site assessments.
Related Concept Videos
Design Example: Analyzing Capacity Contours for Flood Risk Assessment
Flood risk assessment involves careful planning and analysis to ensure the safety of communities near water retention structures. Capacity contours are a vital tool in this process, as they illustrate the potential spread of water at specific levels in a given area. In the context of building a bund across a small valley, these contours play a critical role in evaluating the safety of nearby residential areas.In this example, the bund is intended to store stormwater in the valley. The engineers...
Gradually Varying Flow
Gradually varying flow (GVF) in open channels describes situations where water depth changes slowly along the channel due to factors like non-uniform bed slope, channel shape variations, or obstructions. This flow type occurs when the depth adjusts gradually to balance gravitational forces, shear forces, and energy requirements, resulting in a low rate of depth change.Characteristics of Gradually Varying FlowGVF is commonly observed in natural streams, rivers, and canals, where flow depth...
Design Example: Design of an Irrigation Channel
Trapezoidal channels are widely used in irrigation systems due to their cost-effectiveness and efficiency in conveying water. Trapezoidal channels feature a flat bottom and sloping sides, making them stable and easier to construct compared to other shapes. The bottom width and side slope ratio are determined based on the required flow capacity and site conditions. The side slope is kept gentle for unlined channels to prevent soil erosion.Hydraulic parameters in channel design include the flow...

