Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 16, 2026

Neurodevelopmental Reflex Testing in Neonatal Rat Pups
Published on: April 24, 2017
Is attrition bias a problem in neonatal follow-up?
E T M Hille1, A L den Ouden, M C Stuifbergen
1The Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research, Quality of Life, PO Box 2215, 2301 CE Leiden, the Netherlands. ET.Hille@pg.tno.nl
Aim:
To assess whether attrition rate influences outcome in the follow-up of very preterm infants.
Study Design:
In a national follow-up study of infants born alive in 1983 in the Netherlands with a gestational age less than 32 weeks and/or a birth weight less than 1500 g, outcome was assessed separately for adolescents who responded early or late to a follow-up invitation at age 14 years. Neonatal data and outcome results of earlier assessments from early and late responders were compared to those of non-responders by univariate and nominal (polytomous logistic) regression analysis.
Subjects:
There were 723 (76%) early responders, 130 (14%) late responders and 109 (11%) non-responders.
Results:
We found significantly more non-Dutch origin and more disabilities and school problems at age 10 years in late- and especially in non-responders. At age 14 years, the health utility index was significantly lower in late responders compared to early responders. School outcome did not show difference in relation to the response groups.
Conclusion:
The results suggest that the incidence of adverse outcome in very preterm infants is underestimated when follow-up is incomplete and hence response rate is not a negligible problem in the assessment of late outcome. Therefore, follow-up studies should include a drop-out analysis to enable comparison to other studies.
Related Concept Videos
Longitudinal Research
Regression Toward the Mean
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
Longitudinal Studies
